Literature DB >> 24095710

Sensorial suppression of self-generated sounds and its dependence on attention.

Katja Saupe1, Andreas Widmann, Nelson J Trujillo-Barreto, Erich Schröger.   

Abstract

The auditory processing of self-generated sounds is characterized by an attenuated vertex N1-component of the event-related potential (ERP) compared to the responses elicited by externally generated sounds. Typically, a motor condition where sounds are actively produced by button presses is compared with a passive listening condition. While this effect is usually interpreted as reflection of an internal forward model system, the impact of attention and arousal on the so called self-generation effect has not been systematically controlled in these studies: Is the auditory stimulation more attended during the active task compared to passive listening, e.g., caused by a higher arousal level? Or is it rather attended less and attention is drawn away from the task-irrelevant stimulation to the motor task? Accordingly, the self-generation effects reported in the literature can easily be over- or underestimated. In the present study we disentangled attention from the self-generation effect by introducing an active listening condition, in which attention is focused to the same feature as in the self-generation condition - the stimulus onset-to-onset interval. We observed a classical 'self-generation effect', i.e. attenuated amplitudes for self-generated compared to passive listened sounds at frontocentral electrodes. As expected this effect was overlapped by attention effects in space and time. However, topographical and tomographical analyses allowed us to clearly disentangle both effects. Our results argue for the existence of a genuine self-generation effect, but emphasize the problem of possible over- or underestimation caused by attentional confounds.
© 2013.

Keywords:  Attention; Auditory steady-state response; Event-related potentials; Self-generated sounds

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24095710     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  9 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is differentially modified by expected sound intensity.

Authors:  Daniel Reznik; Yael Henkin; Osnat Levy; Roy Mukamel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Prepulse Inhibition of Auditory Cortical Responses in the Caudolateral Superior Temporal Gyrus in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  Zuyue Chen; Lauri Parkkonen; Jingkuan Wei; Jin-Run Dong; Yuanye Ma; Synnöve Carlson
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 4.  The auditory brain in action: Intention determines predictive processing in the auditory system-A review of current paradigms and findings.

Authors:  Betina Korka; Andreas Widmann; Florian Waszak; Álvaro Darriba; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-09-10

5.  The role of mechanical impact in action-related auditory attenuation.

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.526

6.  Modulation of Auditory Responses to Speech vs. Nonspeech Stimuli during Speech Movement Planning.

Authors:  Ayoub Daliri; Ludo Max
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Sensorimotor Integration Can Enhance Auditory Perception.

Authors:  John C Myers; Jeffrey R Mock; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The effect of precision and power grips on activations in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Patrik A Wikman; Lari Vainio; Teemu Rinne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Neurophysiological evidence of efference copies to inner speech.

Authors:  Thomas J Whitford; Bradley N Jack; Daniel Pearson; Oren Griffiths; David Luque; Anthony Wf Harris; Kevin M Spencer; Mike E Le Pelley
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 8.140

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.