Literature DB >> 24723005

The role of mechanical impact in action-related auditory attenuation.

János Horváth1.   

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that sounds temporally close to one's own finger movements elicit lower-amplitude auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) than do the same tones when they are only listened to. In these studies, the actions have involved making a mechanical contact with an object. In the present study, the role of mechanical contact with an object was investigated in action-related auditory attenuation. In three experiments, participants performed a time-interval production task. In each experiment, in one condition the action involved touching an object, but no mechanical contact was made in the other. The estimated tone-related ERP contributions to the action-tone coincidence ERP waveforms (calculated by subtracting the action-related ERP from the coincidence ERP) were more attenuated when the action involved moving the finger and making a mechanical contact at the end of the movement. However, when participants kept their finger on a piezoelectric element and applied pressure impulses without moving their finger, the action did not result in stronger attenuation of the tone-related auditory ERP estimates. Although these results may suggest that auditory ERP attenuation is stronger for actions resulting in mechanical impact, they also imply that mechanical impact may confound and lead to the overestimation of auditory ERP attenuation in such paradigms, because the impact may result in faint but audible sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24723005     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-014-0283-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  39 in total

1.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control.

Authors:  D M. Wolpert; R C. Miall
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  1996-11

2.  Attention improves population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Stracke; Carsten H Wolters; Frank Schmael; Christo Pantev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Attention to somatosensory events is directly linked to the preparation for action.

Authors:  Imke Galazky; Hartmut Schütze; Toemme Noesselt; Jens-Max Hopf; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.181

4.  Effects of voluntary movements on early auditory brain responses.

Authors:  S Makeig; M M Müller; B Rockstroh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG.

Authors:  János Horváth; Burkhard Maess; Pamela Baess; Annamária Tóth
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Sensory suppression effects to self-initiated sounds reflect the attenuation of the unspecific N1 component of the auditory ERP.

Authors:  Iria SanMiguel; Juanita Todd; Erich Schröger
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  Attenuation of auditory ERPs to action-sound coincidences is not explained by voluntary allocation of attention.

Authors:  János Horváth
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  No evidence for peripheral mechanism attenuating auditory ERPs to self-induced tones.

Authors:  János Horváth; Annamária Burgyán
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2013-03-29       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom.

Authors:  Trinity B Crapse; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Precise force controls enhance loudness discrimination of self-generated sound.

Authors:  Nozomi Endo; Takayuki Ito; Takemi Mochida; Tetsuya Ijiri; Katsumi Watanabe; Kimitaka Nakazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Action-effect related motor adaptation in interactions with everyday devices.

Authors:  János Horváth; Botond Bíró; Bence Neszmélyi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Intention-based and sensory-based predictions.

Authors:  Álvaro Darriba; Yi-Fang Hsu; Sandrien Van Ommen; Florian Waszak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The effect of precision and power grips on activations in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Patrik A Wikman; Lari Vainio; Teemu Rinne
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Investigating cortico-subcortical circuits during auditory sensory attenuation: A combined magnetoencephalographic and dynamic causal modeling study.

Authors:  Lingling Hua; Marc Recasens; Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; Rick A Adams; Joachim Gross; Peter J Uhlhaas
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 5.399

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.