Literature DB >> 24095153

Identifying electrode bridging from electrical distance distributions: a survey of publicly-available EEG data using a new method.

Daniel M Alschuler1, Craig E Tenke2, Gerard E Bruder2, Jürgen Kayser2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: EEG topographies may be distorted by electrode bridges, typically caused by electrolyte spreading between adjacent electrodes. We therefore sought to determine the prevalence of electrode bridging and its potential impact on the EEG literature.
METHODS: Five publicly-available EEG datasets were evaluated for evidence of bridging using a new screening method that employs the temporal variance of pairwise difference waveforms (electrical distance). Distinctive characteristics of electrical distance frequency distributions were used to develop an algorithm to identify electrode bridges in datasets with different montages (22-64 channels) and noise properties.
RESULTS: The extent of bridging varied substantially across datasets: 54% of EEG recording sessions contained an electrode bridge, and the mean percentage of bridged electrodes in a montage was as high as 18% in one of the datasets. Furthermore, over 40% of the recording channels were bridged in 9 of 203 sessions. These findings were independently validated by visual inspection.
CONCLUSIONS: The new algorithm conveniently, efficiently, and reliably identified electrode bridges across different datasets and recording conditions. Electrode bridging may constitute a substantial problem for some datasets. SIGNIFICANCE: Given the extent of the electrode bridging across datasets, this problem may be more widespread than commonly thought. However, when used as an automatic screening routine, the new algorithm will prevent pitfalls stemming from unrecognized electrode bridges.
Copyright © 2013 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artifact; Electrical distance; Electroencephalogram (EEG); Electrolyte bridge; Intrinsic Hjorth; Public dataset

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24095153      PMCID: PMC3943722          DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.08.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  17 in total

1.  The five percent electrode system for high-resolution EEG and ERP measurements.

Authors:  R Oostenveld; P Praamstra
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Effects of electrode density and electrolyte spreading in dense array electroencephalographic recording.

Authors:  Lawrence L Greischar; Cory A Burghy; Carien M van Reekum; Daren C Jackson; Diego A Pizzagalli; Corrina Mueller; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Seperability of four-class motor imagery data using independent components analysis.

Authors:  M Naeem; C Brunner; R Leeb; B Graimann; G Pfurtscheller
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2006-06-27       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Mapping EEG-potentials on the surface of the brain: a strategy for uncovering cortical sources.

Authors:  M Junghöfer; T Elbert; P Leiderer; P Berg; B Rockstroh
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings.

Authors:  Emily S Kappenman; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Neural correlates of attentional and mnemonic processing in event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Justin B Knight; Lauren E Ethridge; Richard L Marsh; Brett A Clementz
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-09       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Hemispatial PCA dissociates temporal from parietal ERP generator patterns: CSD components in healthy adults and depressed patients during a dichotic oddball task.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Stewart A Shankman; Carlye B Griggs; Paul Leite; Jonathan W Stewart; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 10.  Generator localization by current source density (CSD): implications of volume conduction and field closure at intracranial and scalp resolutions.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-15       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  23 in total

1.  Surface Laplacians (SL) and phase properties of EEG rhythms: Simulated generators in a volume-conduction model.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 2.997

2.  Hemifield-dependent N1 and event-related theta/delta oscillations: An unbiased comparison of surface Laplacian and common EEG reference choices.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-01-03       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Auditory event-related potentials and α oscillations in the psychosis prodrome: neuronal generator patterns during a novelty oddball task.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Christopher J Kroppmann; Daniel M Alschuler; Shiva Fekri; Shelly Ben-David; Cheryl M Corcoran; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 2.997

4.  Demonstrating test-retest reliability of electrophysiological measures for healthy adults in a multisite study of biomarkers of antidepressant treatment response.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Pia Pechtel; Christian A Webb; Daniel G Dillon; Franziska Goer; Laura Murray; Patricia Deldin; Benji T Kurian; Patrick J McGrath; Ramin Parsey; Madhukar Trivedi; Maurizio Fava; Myrna M Weissman; Melvin McInnis; Karen Abraham; Jorge E Alvarenga; Daniel M Alschuler; Crystal Cooper; Diego A Pizzagalli; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.016

5.  Frontal theta and posterior alpha in resting EEG: A critical examination of convergent and discriminant validity.

Authors:  Ezra E Smith; Craig E Tenke; Patricia J Deldin; Madhukar H Trivedi; Myrna M Weissman; Randy P Auerbach; Gerard E Bruder; Diego A Pizzagalli; Jürgen Kayser
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 6.  Issues and considerations for using the scalp surface Laplacian in EEG/ERP research: A tutorial review.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Inherent physiological artifacts in EEG during tDCS.

Authors:  Nigel Gebodh; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Kenneth Chelette; Jacek Dmochowski; Adam J Woods; Emily S Kappenman; Lucas C Parra; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Posterior EEG alpha at rest and during task performance: Comparison of current source density and field potential measures.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Karen Abraham; Jorge E Alvarenga; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Temporal stability of posterior EEG alpha over twelve years.

Authors:  Craig E Tenke; Jürgen Kayser; Jorge E Alvarenga; Karen S Abraham; Virginia Warner; Ardesheer Talati; Myrna M Weissman; Gerard E Bruder
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Neuronal generator patterns at scalp elicited by lateralized aversive pictures reveal consecutive stages of motivated attention.

Authors:  Jürgen Kayser; Craig E Tenke; Karen S Abraham; Daniel M Alschuler; Jorge E Alvarenga; Jamie Skipper; Virginia Warner; Gerard E Bruder; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.