Literature DB >> 20374541

The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings.

Emily S Kappenman1, Steven J Luck.   

Abstract

To determine whether data quality is meaningfully reduced by high electrode impedance, EEG was recorded simultaneously from low- and high-impedance electrode sites during an oddball task. Low-frequency noise was found to be increased at high-impedance sites relative to low-impedance sites, especially when the recording environment was warm and humid. The increased noise at the high-impedance sites caused an increase in the number of trials needed to obtain statistical significance in analyses of P3 amplitude, but this could be partially mitigated by high-pass filtering and artifact rejection. High electrode impedance did not reduce statistical power for the N1 wave unless the recording environment was warm and humid. Thus, high electrode impedance may increase noise and decrease statistical power under some conditions, but these effects can be reduced by using a cool and dry recording environment and appropriate signal processing methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20374541      PMCID: PMC2902592          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01009.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  12 in total

1.  Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria.

Authors:  T W Picton; S Bentin; P Berg; E Donchin; S A Hillyard; R Johnson; G A Miller; W Ritter; D S Ruchkin; M D Rugg; M J Taylor
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  High-quality recording of bioelectric events. Part 1. Interference reduction, theory and practice.

Authors:  A C Metting van Rijn; A Peper; C A Grimbergen
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Recording and analyzing high-density event-related potentials with infants. Using the Geodesic sensor net.

Authors:  M H Johnson; M de Haan; A Oliver; W Smith; H Hatzakis; L A Tucker; G Csibra
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: the geodesic sensor net.

Authors:  D M Tucker
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-09

6.  Prevalence and methods of control of the cephalic skin potential EEG artifact.

Authors:  J C Corby; W T Roth; B S Kopell
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 4.016

7.  The reduction of palmar skin potential by epidermal hydration.

Authors:  D C Fowles; P H Venables
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Distortion of ERP averages due to overlap from temporally adjacent ERPs: analysis and correction.

Authors:  M G Woldorff
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  The time constant in P300 recording.

Authors:  C C Duncan-Johnson; E Donchin
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Scalp electrode impedance, infection risk, and EEG data quality.

Authors:  T C Ferree; P Luu; G S Russell; D M Tucker
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.708

View more
  95 in total

1.  The relationship between alpha asymmetry and ADHD depends on negative affect level and parenting practices.

Authors:  Brittany R Alperin; Christiana J Smith; Hanna C Gustafsson; McKenzie T Figuracion; Sarah L Karalunas
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  EEG power spectral slope differs by ADHD status and stimulant medication exposure in early childhood.

Authors:  Madeline M Robertson; Sarah Furlong; Bradley Voytek; Thomas Donoghue; Charlotte A Boettiger; Margaret A Sheridan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  How inappropriate high-pass filters can produce artifactual effects and incorrect conclusions in ERP studies of language and cognition.

Authors:  Darren Tanner; Kara Morgan-Short; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  High-resolution local field potentials measured with deep brain stimulation arrays.

Authors:  Simeng Zhang; Allison T Connolly; Lauren R Madden; Jerrold L Vitek; Matthew D Johnson
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Stimulus-dependent spiking relationships with the EEG.

Authors:  Adam C Snyder; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Neural Variability Is Quenched by Attention.

Authors:  Ayelet Arazi; Yaffa Yeshurun; Ilan Dinstein
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Compliant head probe for positioning electroencephalography electrodes and near-infrared spectroscopy optodes.

Authors:  Paolo Giacometti; Solomon G Diamond
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.170

8.  Brain-computer interface (BCI) evaluation in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Authors:  Lynn M McCane; Eric W Sellers; Dennis J McFarland; Joseph N Mak; C Steve Carmack; Debra Zeitlin; Jonathan R Wolpaw; Theresa M Vaughan
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 4.092

9.  Identifying electrode bridging from electrical distance distributions: a survey of publicly-available EEG data using a new method.

Authors:  Daniel M Alschuler; Craig E Tenke; Gerard E Bruder; Jürgen Kayser
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Ballistocardiogram artifact removal with a reference layer and standard EEG cap.

Authors:  Qingfei Luo; Xiaoshan Huang; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.