Literature DB >> 24094761

The public disclosure of accreditation information in Australia: stakeholder perceptions of opportunities and challenges.

David Greenfield1, Reece Hinchcliff, Marjorie Pawsey, Johanna Westbrook, Jeffrey Braithwaite.   

Abstract

Public disclosure is increasingly a requirement of accrediting agencies and governments. There are few published empirical evaluations of disclosure interventions that inform evidence-based implementation or policy. This study investigated the practices associated with the public disclosure of healthcare accreditation information, in addition to multi-stakeholder perceptions of key challenges and opportunities for improvement. We conducted a mixed methods study comprising analysis of disclosure practices by accreditation agencies, and 47 semi-structured individual or group interviews involving 258 people. Participants were diverse stakeholders associated with Australian primary, acute and residential aged care accreditation programmes. Four interrelated issues were identified. First, there was broad agreement that accreditation information should be publicly disclosed, although the three accreditation agencies differed in the information they made public. Second, two implementation issues emerged: the need to educate the community about accreditation information, and the practical question of the detail to be provided. Third, the impact, both positive and negative, of disclosing accreditation information was raised. Fourth, the lack of knowledge about the impact on consumers was discussed. Public disclosure of accreditation information is an idea that has widespread support. However, translating the idea into practice, so as to produce appropriate, meaningful information, is a challenge.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Accreditation; Empirical study; Healthcare; Public disclosure

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094761     DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Policy        ISSN: 0168-8510            Impact factor:   2.980


  5 in total

1.  Potential pros and cons of external healthcare performance evaluation systems: real-life perspectives on Iranian hospital evaluation and accreditation program.

Authors:  Ebrahim Jaafaripooyan
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-09-14

2.  Comparing the old to the new: A comparison of similarities and differences of the accreditation standards of the chiropractic council on education-international from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Stanley I Innes; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2018-08-15

3.  Are Councils on Chiropractic Education expectations of chiropractic graduates changing for the better: a comparison of similarities and differences of the graduate competencies of the Chiropractic Council on Education-Australasia from 2009 to 2017.

Authors:  Stanley I Innes; Amanda Kimpton
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2020-05-24

4.  A perspective on Councils on Chiropractic Education accreditation standards and processes from the inside: a narrative description of expert opinion: Part 2: Analyses of particular responses to research findings.

Authors:  Stanley I Innes; Vicki Cope; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-09-12

5.  A perspective on Chiropractic Councils on Education accreditation standards and processes from the inside: a narrative description of expert opinion: Part 1: Themes.

Authors:  Stanley I Innes; Vicki Cope; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Bruce F Walker
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2019-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.