Literature DB >> 24094537

Effects of roughage source, amount, and particle size on behavior and gastrointestinal health of veal calves.

L E Webb1, E A M Bokkers, L F M Heutinck, B Engel, W G Buist, T B Rodenburg, N Stockhofe-Zurwieden, C G van Reenen.   

Abstract

The European Union 1997 Directive, stipulating that veal calves should be fed a minimum of 50 to 250 g of fibrous feed from 8 to 20 wk of age, is vague. A fibrous feed ration maximum of 250 g has been implicated in welfare issues, namely the occurrence of abnormal oral behaviors and poor gastrointestinal health. Past research suggests that this amount is insufficient to prevent the development of abnormal oral behaviors and enabling good rumen development. Different sources and particle sizes of roughage could lead to very different welfare outcomes. In a 3×2 × 2 factorial design, 240 group-housed calves (10±1 d; 46.1±0.1 kg) were fed different roughage sources (straw, maize silage, or maize cob silage; the latter 2 were dried and provided no extra moisture compared with straw) in 2 amounts (250 or 500 g of dry matter per day), and 2 particle sizes (chopped or ground). Roughage was supplemented to milk replacer (MR) from 2 wk after arrival. In addition, 60 calves were fed 1 of 3 additional control treatments: MR only (n=20), MR plus an iron supplement (n=20), or MR plus ad libitum hay (n=20). Oral behaviors were recorded using instantaneous scan sampling at 2-min intervals for 2 h in 3 periods per day, at 12 and 22 wk of age. Calves were slaughtered at 24 wk of age and rumen and abomasal health parameters were recorded. Limited provision of straw resulted in behavior comparable with that from unlimited provision of hay, with reduced tongue playing and oral manipulation of the environment, as well as increased chewing compared with diets with no roughage supplement. Straw prevented ruminal hairballs, but impaired rumen development and increased abomasal damage. A higher ration of roughage increased chewing (12 wk), decreased oral manipulation of the trough (12 and 22 wk) and the pen (22 wk), and increased rumen weight. However, more roughage led to increased abomasal damage for certain parameters. Longer feed particles had no obvious benefits for behavior, but decreased hairball prevalence. Overall, unlimited hay had the highest benefit for both behavior and gastrointestinal health. Adding iron to the MR did not alter behavior or gastrointestinal health compared with MR without iron supplement. This study demonstrated that different roughage sources, amounts, and particle sizes have different effects on veal calf behavior and gastrointestinal health, and hence on veal calf welfare.
Copyright © 2013 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  behavior; gastrointestinal health; roughage; veal calf

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24094537     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2012-6135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  4 in total

1.  Effect of forage to concentrate ratio on growth performance and feeding behavior of Thalli lambs.

Authors:  Muhammad Farhan Ayaz Chishti; Muhammad Aziz Ur Rahman; Karamo Jatta; Sajjad Khan; Muhammad Riaz; Qamar Bilal; Urooj Anwar; Sibtain Ahmad; Hassan Munir Bajwa; Fahd Rasul
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 1.893

2.  Stereotypic Behavior in Fattening Bulls.

Authors:  Laura Schneider; Nicole Kemper; Birgit Spindler
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Chopped or long roughage: what do calves prefer? Using cross point analysis of double demand functions.

Authors:  Laura E Webb; Margit Bak Jensen; Bas Engel; Cornelis G van Reenen; Walter J J Gerrits; Imke J M de Boer; Eddie A M Bokkers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Using routinely collected data to evaluate risk factors for mortality of veal calves.

Authors:  I M G A Santman-Berends; A J G de Bont-Smolenaars; L Roos; A G J Velthuis; G van Schaik
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.670

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.