| Literature DB >> 24093062 |
Eloísa Urrechaga1, Urko Aguirre, Silvia Izquierdo.
Abstract
Introduction. Iron deficiency anemia and thalassemia are the most common causes of microcytic anemia. Powerful statistical computer programming enables sensitive discriminant analyses to aid in the diagnosis. We aimed at investigating the performance of the multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) to the differential diagnosis of microcytic anemia. Methods. The training group was composed of 200 β -thalassemia carriers, 65 α -thalassemia carriers, 170 iron deficiency anemia (IDA), and 45 mixed cases of thalassemia and acute phase response or iron deficiency. A set of potential predictor parameters that could detect differences among groups were selected: Red Blood Cells (RBC), hemoglobin (Hb), mean cell volume (MCV), mean cell hemoglobin (MCH), and RBC distribution width (RDW). The functions obtained with MDA analysis were applied to a set of 628 consecutive patients with microcytic anemia. Results. For classifying patients into two groups (genetic anemia and acquired anemia), only one function was needed; 87.9% β -thalassemia carriers, and 83.3% α -thalassemia carriers, and 72.1% in the mixed group were correctly classified. Conclusion. Linear discriminant functions based on hemogram data can aid in differentiating between IDA and thalassemia, so samples can be efficiently selected for further analysis to confirm the presence of genetic anemia.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24093062 PMCID: PMC3777209 DOI: 10.1155/2013/457834
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anemia ISSN: 2090-1267
Hematological and biochemical data for the study patients comprised 170 with iron deficiency anemia (IDA), 200 β-thalassemia carriers, 65 α-thalassemia carriers, and 45 mixed clinical situations (hemoglobinopathy and other disease, iron deficiency, or pregnancy). Values are reported as mean (standard deviation).
| Mixeda |
| IDAc |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RBC, 1012/L | 5.70 | 5.79 | 4.72 | 5.40 | <0.001 |
| (0.57)c,d | (0.54)c,d | (0.48)all | (0.55)all | ||
| Hb, g/L | 116 | 119 | 105 | 123 | <0.001 |
| (13.2)d | (11.2)d | (11.0)c,d | (14.0)all | ||
| MCV, fL | 64.6 | 64.6 | 73.7 | 70.5 | <0.001 |
| (4.08)c,d | (3.39)c,d | (4.63)all | (2.96)all | ||
| MCH, pg | 20.4 | 20.6 | 22.3 | 22.7 | <0.001 |
| (1.48)c,d | (1.11)c,d | (1.86)a,b | (1.08)a,b | ||
| RDW, % | 16.9 | 16.1 | 18.2 | 15.9 | <0.001 |
| (1.84)c | (1.06)c | (3.03)all | (1.51)c |
RBC: Red Blood Cells; Hb: hemoglobin; MCV: mean cell volume; MCH: mean cell hemoglobin; RDW: RBC distribution width.
Superscript letters (a,b,c,d,all) indicate significant differences between groups.
P < 0.001 was for the studied blood markers for the mean differences between acquired (IDA) and genetic anemia.
Standardized canonical coefficients obtained from the linear discriminant analysis.
| Classification type I | Classification type II | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First function | Second function | First function | ||||
| Standardized coefficient | Relative importance | Standardized coefficient | Relative importance | Standardized coefficient | Relative importance | |
| RBC | 0.902 | −0.532* | 5.481 | 0.154 | 1.778 | 0.537* |
| Hb | −1.362 | −0.332 | −5.723 | −0.410* | −2.225 | 0.284 |
| MCV | 1.607 | 0.609 | 0.481 | −0.636* | 1.814 | −0.361* |
| MCH | −0.257 | 0.292 | 2.408 | −0.788* | 0.152 | −0.529* |
| RDW | 0.461 | 0.267 | 0.064 | 0.268 | 0.441 | 0.237 |
|
| ||||||
| Proportion of trace (%) | 91.26 | 8.59 | 100 | |||
RBC: Red Blood Cells; Hb: hemoglobin; MCV: mean cell volume; MCH: mean cell hemoglobin; RDW: RBC distribution width.
First function: first linear discrimination function. Second function: second discrimination function. Classification type I: disease groups categorized into four diseases: mixed, β-thalassemia, α-thalassemia, and IDA. Classification type II: targeted diseases as genetic anemia (mixed, β- and α-thalassemia) and acquired anemia.
Standardized coefficient: standardized coefficient obtained from the linear discriminant analysis of each blood marker for the considered functions.
Relative importance: correlations of each variable with each discriminant functions.
*A correlation higher than 0.40 is considered significant.
Proportion of trace (%): proportion of variability of the outcome explained by the considered independent variables.
Figure 1Linear discrimination plot for the studied classification type I (a) and boxplot for the classification type II in the training set (b). Black symbols in the linear discriminant plot indicate centroid groups. Dashed line in the boxplot reflects the cut-off value for the required discriminant function.
Distribution of predicted versus actual disease classification in the validation set applying the classification type I. Number of patients (column %).
| Predicted diagnosis | Actual diagnosis | IDA |
| Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed |
| ||||
| Mixed | 6 (13.7) | 17 (27) | 13 (2.6) | 2 (12.5) | 38 |
|
| 3 (6.8) | 19 (30.1) | 3 (0.6) | 0 | 25 |
| IDA | 13 (29.5) | 2 (3.2) | 355 (70.3) | 3 (18.7) | 373 |
|
| 22 (50) | 25 (39.7) | 134 (26.5) | 11 (68.8) | 192 |
|
| |||||
| Total | 44 | 63 | 505 | 16 | |
IDA: iron deficiency anemia.
Distribution of predicted versus actual disease classification in the validation set applying the classification type II. Number of patients (column %).
| Predicted diagnosis | Actual diagnosis | |
|---|---|---|
| Acquired anemia ( | Genetic anemia ( | |
| Acquired anemia, IDA ( | 412 (81.6) | 24 (19.5) |
| Genetic anemia ( | 93 (18.4) | 99 (80.5) |
IDA: iron deficiency anemia.