| Literature DB >> 24093046 |
Weidong Pan1, Xiaojing Su, Jie Bao, Jun Wang, Jin Zhu, Dingfang Cai, Li Yu, Hua Zhou.
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the efficacy and safety of the traditional Chinese medicine Jiawei Sijunzi (JWSJZ) decoction for the treatment of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Methods. Forty-eight patients with ALS were divided into a JWSJZ group (n = 24) and a control group (n = 24) using a randomized number method. Together with the basic treatment for ALS, JWSJZ decoction was added to the treatment regimen of patients in the JWSJZ group or Riluzole was administered to the control group for 6 months. Neurologists evaluated the treated and control patients using the ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS) before, 3 and 6 months after starting the additional treatments. Results. The ALSFRS scores in both groups were lower 3 and 6 months after treatment than before. There was a significant difference at 6 months after treatment between the subgroups of patients with ALS whose limbs were the initial site of attack. No serious adverse effects were observed in the JWSJZ group. Conclusion. JWSJZ decoction may be a safe treatment for ALS, and may have delayed the development of ALS, especially in the subgroup of patients in whom the limbs were attacked first when compared with Riluzole treatment.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24093046 PMCID: PMC3777196 DOI: 10.1155/2013/347525
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Baseline clinical characteristics of the two ALS groups.
| Subjects | JWSJZ group ( | Control group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 51.6 ± 7.2 | 50.1 ± 4.2 | 0.89 |
| Men/Women | 14/9 | 11/8 | — |
| Disease duration (months) | 25.9 ± 24.7 | 26.1 ± 24.9 | 0.37 |
| Mean time from diagnosis (months) | 18.35 ± 16.78 | 17.59 ± 13.51 | 0.29 |
| Area where ALS first developed—limbs/bulbar/both | 18/3/3 | 19/2/3 | — |
| ALSFRS | 37.1 ± 7.6 | 37.4 ± 9.2 | 0.65 |
Figure 1CONSORT flow diagram of JWSJZ decoction for the treatment of patients with ALS.
Comparison of ALSFRS before and after treatment for JWSJZ group and control group (χ ± S).
| Variable |
| ALSFRS | Rate of change (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | 3 m | 6 m | ||
| JWSJZ | 24 | 23 | 38.2 ± 6.3 | 36.1 ± 8.7 | 34.4 ± 7.9* | 13.57 |
| Control | 24 | 19 | 37.9 ± 7.7 | 34.3 ± 6.8 | 30.6 ± 9.1* | 19.26 |
JWSJZ: Jiawei Sijunzi decoction; ALSFRS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale; *P < 0.05 compared with before treatment for the same group; rate of change: counted between before treatment and 6 months for the same group.
Comparison of ALSFRS before and after treatment for limbs first attacked subgroups of JWSJZ group and control group (χ ± S).
| Variable |
| ALSFRS | Rate of change (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | 3 m | 6 m | ||
| JWSZJ | 18 | 18 | 37.1 ± 7.6 | 35.2 ± 7.4 | 33.9 ± 6.2* | 10.68# |
| Control | 19 | 18 | 37.4 ± 9.2 | 34.5 ± 4.5 | 31.6 ± 8.9* | 19.03 |
JWSJZ: Jiawei Sijunzi decoction; ALSFRS: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis functional rating scale; *P < 0.05 compared with before treatment for the same group; # P < 0.01, compared with JWSJZ group; rate of change; counted between before treatment and 6 months for the same group.
Comparison of SF-36 physical function (PF) sub-scale and mean distal limb muscle strength between JWSJZ group and control group before and after treatment (χ ± S).
| Variable |
| PF sub-scale | Distal limb muscle strength | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before | After | Before | 3 m | 6 m | Before | 3 m | 6 m | |
| JWSJZ | 24 | 23 | 43.1 ± 5.2 | 42.4 ± 7.3 | 38.9 ± 4.9* | 3.7 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.3 | 3.5 ± 0.7 |
| Control | 24 | 19 | 42.9 ± 4.9 | 42.3 ± 6.8 | 37.6 ± 7.7* | 3.7 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 0.4 |
JWSJZ: Jiawei Sijunzi decoction; PF sub-scale: physical function sub-scale; *P < 0.05 compared with before treatment for the same group.