| Literature DB >> 24092967 |
Lukas Reznicek1, Florian Seidensticker, Thomas Mann, Irene Hübert, Alexandra Buerger, Christos Haritoglou, Aljoscha S Neubauer, Anselm Kampik, Christoph Hirneiss, Marcus Kernt.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and retinal pigment epithelium alterations in patients with advanced glaucomatous visual field defects.Entities:
Keywords: FAF; OCT; RNFL; fundus autofluorescence; glaucoma; imaging; optical coherence tomography; retinal nerve fiber layer
Year: 2013 PMID: 24092967 PMCID: PMC3788816 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S49112
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Figure 1Structure–function relationship between visual field (A) and peripapillary nerve fiber layer obtained with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (C and D), adapted for corresponding locations of the posterior fundus (D).
Note: The principle of the evaluation is based on the works of Strouthis et al.40
Patient characteristics: age, BCVA, vertical CDR, and US-CCT
| Parameter | n = 84 |
|---|---|
| Patient characteristics | |
| Age (years) | 64 ± 13 |
| BCVA (Snellen) | 0.78 ± 0.25 |
| CDR | 0.82 ± 0.15 |
| US-CCT (μm) | 541 ± 35 |
Note: Values are given as mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; CDR, vertical cup/disc ratio; US-CCT, ultrasound-based measurement of central corneal thickness.
Age distribution of all included patients
| Overall | n = 84 |
|---|---|
| Age subgroups (years) | n |
| 31–40 | 4 |
| 41–50 | 10 |
| 51–60 | 14 |
| 61–70 | 31 |
| 71–80 | 19 |
| 81–90 | 6 |
Mean FAF intensities and peripapillary RNFL thickness values for each analyzed sector (1–6)
| FAF intensities (0–255) | RNFL thickness (μm) | |
|---|---|---|
| Sector | ||
| Superotemporal peripheral (1) | 160 ± 27 | 55.9 ± 15.8 |
| Superotemporal central (2) | 146 ± 24 | 74.2 ± 23.7 |
| Temporal central (3) | 163 ± 28 | 78.6 ± 24.5 |
| Inferotemporal central (4) | 165 ± 26 | 90.3 ± 28.7 |
| Inferotemporal peripheral (5) | 175 ± 29 | 94.0 ± 33.8 |
| Nasal (6) | 171 ± 28 | 54.1 ± 15.2 |
Note: Values are given as mean ± standard deviation.
Abbreviations: FAF, fundus autofluorescence; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer.
Correlations (Pearson correlation coefficient) between FAF intensity and peripapillary RNFL thickness at corresponding sectors (1–6)
| Correlation between sectoral mean FAF intensity and RNFL thickness | |
|---|---|
| Sector | |
| Superotemporal peripheral (1) | 0.273; |
| Superotemporal central (2) | 0.114; |
| Temporal central (3) | 0.004; |
| Inferotemporal central (4) | 0.324; |
| Inferotemporal peripheral (5) | 0.280; |
| Nasal (6) | 0.376; |
Note:
Values that were statistically significant.
Abbreviations: FAF, fundus autofluorescence; RNFL, retinal nerve fiber layer.