Literature DB >> 24092819

Point and click, carefully: investigating inconsistent response styles in middle school and college students involved in web-based longitudinal substance use research.

Jeffrey D Wardell1, Michelle L Rogers2, Leonard J Simms3, Kristina M Jackson2, Jennifer P Read3.   

Abstract

This study investigated inconsistent responding to survey items by participants involved in longitudinal, web-based substance use research. We also examined cross-sectional and prospective predictors of inconsistent responding. Middle school (N = 1,023) and college students (N = 995) from multiple sites in the United States responded to online surveys assessing substance use and related variables in three waves of data collection. We applied a procedure for creating an index of inconsistent responding at each wave that involved identifying pairs of items with considerable redundancy and calculating discrepancies in responses to these items. Inconsistent responding was generally low in the Middle School sample and moderate in the College sample, with individuals showing only modest stability in inconsistent responding over time. Multiple regression analyses identified several baseline variables-including demographic, personality, and behavioral variables-that were uniquely associated with inconsistent responding both cross-sectionally and prospectively. Alcohol and substance involvement showed some bivariate associations with inconsistent responding, but these associations largely were accounted for by other factors. The results suggest that high levels of carelessness or inconsistency do not appear to characterize participants' responses to longitudinal web-based surveys of substance use and support the use of inconsistency indices as a tool for identifying potentially problematic responders.
© The Author(s) 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  inconsistency; internet; longitudinal; response style; substance use; validity; web based

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24092819      PMCID: PMC4247343          DOI: 10.1177/1073191113505681

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Assessment        ISSN: 1073-1911


  26 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods?

Authors:  Elizabeth T Miller; Dan J Neal; Lisa J Roberts; John S Baer; Sally O Cressler; Jane Metrik; G Alan Marlatt
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2002-03

2.  What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring.

Authors:  M Kerr; H Stattin
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2000-05

Review 3.  Using the internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: a review.

Authors:  Peter G Miller; Anders L Sønderlund
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 6.526

4.  Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: development and initial validation.

Authors:  J A Schinka; B N Kinder; T Kremer
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1997-02

5.  Heavy drinking across the transition to college: predicting first-semester heavy drinking from precollege variables.

Authors:  Kenneth J Sher; Patricia C Rutledge
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  Maternal socialization of adolescent smoking: the intergenerational transmission of parenting and smoking.

Authors:  L Chassin; C C Presson; M Todd; J S Rose; S J Sherman
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1998-11

7.  Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL).

Authors:  E B Blanchard; J Jones-Alexander; T C Buckley; C A Forneris
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1996-08

8.  Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology.

Authors:  C F Turner; L Ku; S M Rogers; L D Lindberg; J H Pleck; F L Sonenstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Comparing data collected by computerized and written surveys for adolescence health research.

Authors:  Ying Wu; Susan A Newfield
Journal:  J Sch Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.118

10.  Measuring developmental changes in alcohol expectancies.

Authors:  Terry L Schell; Steven C Martino; Phyllis L Ellickson; Rebecca L Collins; Daniel McCaffrey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2005-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Adolescent recanting of alcohol use: A longitudinal investigation of time-varying intra-individual predictors.

Authors:  Alexander W Sokolovsky; Tim Janssen; Nancy P Barnett; Suzanne M Colby; Michael H Bernstein; Kerri L Hayes; Kristina M Jackson
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Random responses inflate statistical estimates in heavily skewed addictions data.

Authors:  Kevin M King; Dale S Kim; Connor J McCabe
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-12-09       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Investigating child self-report capacity: a systematic review and utility analysis.

Authors:  Katherine B Bevans; Isaac L Ahuvia; Taye M Hallock; Rochelle Mendonca; Stephanie Roth; Christopher B Forrest; Courtney Blackwell; Jessica Kramer; Lauren Wakschlag
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.147

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.