Literature DB >> 24091731

Differences in 53BP1 and BRCA1 regulation between cycling and non-cycling cells.

Monica Croke1, Martin A Neumann, David A Grotsky, Ray Kreienkamp, Sree C Yaddanapudi, Susana Gonzalo.   

Abstract

BRCA1 and 53BP1 play decisive roles in the choice of DNA double-strand break repair mechanisms. BRCA1 promotes DNA end resection and homologous recombination (HR) during S/G 2 phases of the cell cycle, while 53BP1 inhibits end resection and facilitates non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ), primarily during G 1. This competitive relationship is critical for genome integrity during cell division. However, their relationship in the many cells in our body that are not cycling is unknown. We discovered profound differences in 53BP1 and BRCA1 regulation between cycling and non-cycling cells. Cellular growth arrest results in transcriptional downregulation of BRCA1 and activation of cathepsin-L (CTSL)-mediated degradation of 53BP1. Accordingly, growth-arrested cells do not form BRCA1 or 53BP1 ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF). Interestingly, cell cycle re-entry reverts this scenario, with upregulation of BRCA1, downregulation of CTSL, stabilization of 53BP1, and 53BP1 IRIF formation throughout the cycle, indicating that BRCA1 and 53BP1 are important in replicating cells and dispensable in non-cycling cells. We show that CTSL-mediated degradation of 53BP1, previously associated with aggressive breast cancers, is an endogenous mechanism of non-cycling cells to balance NHEJ (53BP1) and HR (BRCA1). Breast cancer cells exploit this mechanism to ensure genome stability and viability, providing an opportunity for targeted therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  53BP1; BRCA1; DNA repair; cathepsin L; cell cycle

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24091731      PMCID: PMC3903714          DOI: 10.4161/cc.26582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


  37 in total

Review 1.  Chromosomal stability and the DNA double-stranded break connection.

Authors:  D C van Gent; J H Hoeijmakers; R Kanaar
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells.

Authors:  R D Johnson; M Jasin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-07-03       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control.

Authors:  Stephen C West
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Pathways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mammalian cell cycle.

Authors:  Kai Rothkamm; Ines Krüger; Larry H Thompson; Markus Löbrich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  In search of the tumour-suppressor functions of BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  R Scully; D M Livingston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-11-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair.

Authors:  M E Moynahan; J W Chiu; B H Koller; M Jasin
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice.

Authors:  Irene M Ward; Kay Minn; Jan van Deursen; Junjie Chen
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Role for the BRCA1 C-terminal repeats (BRCT) protein 53BP1 in maintaining genomic stability.

Authors:  Julio C Morales; Zhenfang Xia; Tao Lu; Melissa B Aldrich; Bin Wang; Corina Rosales; Rodney E Kellems; Walter N Hittelman; Stephen J Elledge; Phillip B Carpenter
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  Human severe combined immune deficiency and DNA repair.

Authors:  Klaus Schwarz; Yunmei Ma; Ulrich Pannicke; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 10.  Role of the tumor suppressor gene Brca1 in genetic stability and mammary gland tumor formation.

Authors:  C X Deng; F Scott
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-02-21       Impact factor: 9.867

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of oncogene-induced genomic instability.

Authors:  Simona Graziano; Susana Gonzalo
Journal:  Biophys Chem       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  XPA is susceptible to proteolytic cleavage by cathepsin L during lysis of quiescent cells.

Authors:  Saman Khan; William Cvammen; Nadeen Anabtawi; Jun-Hyuk Choi; Michael G Kemp
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-12-02

3.  Targeting the epigenetics of the DNA damage response in breast cancer.

Authors:  M F Montenegro; R González-Guerrero; L Sánchez-del-Campo; A Piñero-Madrona; J Cabezas-Herrera; J N Rodríguez-López
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 8.469

Review 4.  Common Chemical Inductors of Replication Stress:  Focus on Cell-Based Studies.

Authors:  Eva Vesela; Katarina Chroma; Zsofia Turi; Martin Mistrik
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2017-02-21

5.  Vitamin D/vitamin D receptor axis regulates DNA repair during oncogene-induced senescence.

Authors:  S Graziano; R Johnston; O Deng; J Zhang; S Gonzalo
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 9.867

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.