Literature DB >> 24091095

Incompleteness of the circle of Willis is related to EEG-based shunting during carotid endarterectomy.

C W A Pennekamp1, P J van Laar, J Hendrikse, H M den Ruijter, M L Bots, H B van der Worp, L J Kappelle, W F Buhre, R L A W Bleys, F L Moll, G J de Borst.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The occurrence of cerebral ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can be prevented by (selective) placement of an intraluminal shunt during cross-clamping. We set out to develop a rule to predict the likelihood for shunting during CEA based on preoperative assessment of collateral cerebral circulation and patient characteristics.
METHODS: Patients who underwent CEA between 2004 and 2010 were included. Patients without preoperative magnetic resonance (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) were excluded. The primary endpoint was intraluminal shunt placement based on electroencephalography changes. Age, sex, cardiovascular risk factors peripheral artery disease, symptomatic status, degree of ipsilateral and contralateral carotid, status of the vertebral arteries, and morphology of the CoW were studied as potential predictors for shunt use. A prediction model was derived from a multivariable regression model using discrimination, calibration, and bootstrapping approaches and transformed into a clinical prediction model.
RESULTS: A total of 431 patients were included, of which 65 patients (15%) received an intraluminal shunt. In the MRA group (n = 285) factors related to shunt use in multivariate analysis were ipsilateral carotid stenosis 90-99% (odds ratio [OR] 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.53), contralateral carotid occlusion (OR 4.29, 95% CI 1.68-10.95) and any not-visible anterior (OR 4.96, 95% CI 1.95-12.58) or ipsilateral posterior segment of the CoW (OR 5.08, 95% CI 2.10-12.32). In the CT group none of the factors were independently related to shunt use; therefore, only predictors describing morphology of CoW derived from MRA findings were included in our model. The c-statistic of this model was 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.86). Among patients with an estimated chance of needing a shunt of under 10% (49% of the population), the likelihood of shunting was 5%. In those in whom this chance was estimated higher than 30% (13% of the population) the likelihood was 51%.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients scheduled for CEA, assessment of cerebral arteries and of the configuration of the CoW based on MRA-derived images can help to identify patients with low and high likelihood of the need of shunt use during surgery.
Copyright © 2013 European Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid endarterectomy; Circle of Willis; EEG; Imaging; Prediction model; Shunting

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24091095     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  10 in total

1.  The impact of contralateral carotid artery stenosis on outcomes after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Alexander B Pothof; Peter A Soden; Margriet Fokkema; Sara L Zettervall; Sarah E Deery; Thomas C F Bodewes; Gert J de Borst; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Predictors of cross-clamp-induced intraoperative monitoring changes during carotid endarterectomy using both electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Natalie Domenick Sridharan; Partha Thirumala; Rabih Chaer; Jeffrey Balzer; Becky Long; Donald Crammond; Michel Makaroun; Efthymios Avgerinos
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Experimental study of hemodynamics in the Circle of Willis.

Authors:  Guangyu Zhu; Qi Yuan; Jian Yang; Joon Yeo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Effective collateral circulation may indicate improved perfusion territory restoration after carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Tianye Lin; Zhichao Lai; Yuelei Lv; Jianxun Qu; Zhentao Zuo; Hui You; Bing Wu; Bo Hou; Changwei Liu; Feng Feng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Multidetector CT angiography of the Circle of Willis: association of its variants with carotid artery disease and brain ischemia.

Authors:  Andrea Varga; Giovanni Di Leo; Péter Vince Banga; Csaba Csobay-Novák; Márton Kolossváry; Pál Maurovich-Horvat; Kálmán Hüttl
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  The utility of adjunctive electroencephalography while performing transcarotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Drew J Braet; Naveen Balasundaram; Tiffany S Meller; Jonathan Bath; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2019-11-09

7.  Anatomical Variations in the Circulus Arteriosus Cerebri with Clinical Importance - Results of an Magnetic Resonance Angiography Study and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jeton Shatri; Sadi Bexheti; Mete Shatri; Antigona Kabashi; Sefedin Mucaj
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2021-02-15

8.  Somatosensory Evoked Potentials and Electroencephalography during Carotid Endarterectomy Predict Late Stroke but not Death.

Authors:  Natalie Domenick Sridharan; Rabih A Chaer; Partha D Thirumala; Jeffrey Balzer; Becky Long; Edith Tzeng; Michel S Makaroun; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 1.466

9.  Arterial collateral anatomy predicts the risk for intra-operative changes in somatosensory evoked potentials in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mandy D Müller; Kathleen Seidel; Giovanni Peschi; Eike Piechowiak; Pascal J Mosimann; Philippe Schucht; Andreas Raabe; David Bervini
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 2.216

10.  The role of the circle of Willis in internal carotid artery stenosis and anatomical variations: a computational study based on a patient-specific three-dimensional model.

Authors:  Guangyu Zhu; Qi Yuan; Jian Yang; Joon Hock Yeo
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.