Alison M Pouch1, Mathieu Vergnat2, Jeremy R McGarvey3, Giovanni Ferrari3, Benjamin M Jackson3, Chandra M Sehgal4, Paul A Yushkevich4, Robert C Gorman3, Joseph H Gorman5. 1. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 5. Gorman Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: gormanj@uphs.upenn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The basis of mitral annuloplasty ring design has progressed from qualitative surgical intuition to experimental and theoretical analysis of annular geometry with quantitative imaging techniques. In this work, we present an automated three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic image analysis method that can be used to statistically assess variability in normal mitral annular geometry to support advancement in annuloplasty ring design. METHODS: Three-dimensional patient-specific models of the mitral annulus were automatically generated from 3D echocardiographic images acquired from subjects with normal mitral valve structure and function. Geometric annular measurements including annular circumference, annular height, septolateral diameter, intercommissural width, and the annular height to intercommissural width ratio were automatically calculated. A mean 3D annular contour was computed, and principal component analysis was used to evaluate variability in normal annular shape. RESULTS: The following mean ± standard deviations were obtained from 3D echocardiographic image analysis: annular circumference, 107.0 ± 14.6 mm; annular height, 7.6 ± 2.8 mm; septolateral diameter, 28.5 ± 3.7 mm; intercommissural width, 33.0 ± 5.3 mm; and annular height to intercommissural width ratio, 22.7% ± 6.9%. Principal component analysis indicated that shape variability was primarily related to overall annular size, with more subtle variation in the skewness and height of the anterior annular peak, independent of annular diameter. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-specific 3D echocardiographic-based modeling of the human mitral valve enables statistical analysis of physiologically normal mitral annular geometry. The tool can potentially lead to the development of a new generation of annuloplasty rings that restore the diseased mitral valve annulus back to a truly normal geometry.
BACKGROUND: The basis of mitral annuloplasty ring design has progressed from qualitative surgical intuition to experimental and theoretical analysis of annular geometry with quantitative imaging techniques. In this work, we present an automated three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic image analysis method that can be used to statistically assess variability in normal mitral annular geometry to support advancement in annuloplasty ring design. METHODS: Three-dimensional patient-specific models of the mitral annulus were automatically generated from 3D echocardiographic images acquired from subjects with normal mitral valve structure and function. Geometric annular measurements including annular circumference, annular height, septolateral diameter, intercommissural width, and the annular height to intercommissural width ratio were automatically calculated. A mean 3D annular contour was computed, and principal component analysis was used to evaluate variability in normal annular shape. RESULTS: The following mean ± standard deviations were obtained from 3D echocardiographic image analysis: annular circumference, 107.0 ± 14.6 mm; annular height, 7.6 ± 2.8 mm; septolateral diameter, 28.5 ± 3.7 mm; intercommissural width, 33.0 ± 5.3 mm; and annular height to intercommissural width ratio, 22.7% ± 6.9%. Principal component analysis indicated that shape variability was primarily related to overall annular size, with more subtle variation in the skewness and height of the anterior annular peak, independent of annular diameter. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-specific 3D echocardiographic-based modeling of the human mitral valve enables statistical analysis of physiologically normal mitral annular geometry. The tool can potentially lead to the development of a new generation of annuloplasty rings that restore the diseased mitral valve annulus back to a truly normal geometry.
Authors: Liam P Ryan; Benjamin M Jackson; Yoshiharu Enomoto; Landi Parish; Theodore J Plappert; Martin G St John-Sutton; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: A Carpentier; A Deloche; J Dauptain; R Soyer; P Blondeau; A Piwnica; C Dubost; D C McGoon Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1971-01 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: A F Carpentier; A Lessana; J Y Relland; E Belli; S Mihaileanu; A J Berrebi; E Palsky; D F Loulmet Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 1995-11 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: J H Gorman; K B Gupta; J T Streicher; R C Gorman; B M Jackson; M B Ratcliffe; D K Bogen; L H Edmunds Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Ivan S Salgo; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Benjamin M Jackson; Frank W Bowen; Theodore Plappert; Martin G St John Sutton; L Henry Edmunds Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-08-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: R A Levine; M D Handschumacher; A J Sanfilippo; A A Hagege; P Harrigan; J E Marshall; A E Weyman Journal: Circulation Date: 1989-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew A Jolley; Peter E Hammer; Sunil J Ghelani; Adi Adar; Lynn A Sleeper; Ronald V Lacro; Gerald R Marx; Meena Nathan; David M Harrild Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2018-08-08 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Ahmed H Aly; Abdullah H Aly; Mahmoud Elrakhawy; Kirlos Haroun; Luis Prieto-Riascos; Robert C Gorman; Natalie Yushkevich; Yoshiaki Saito; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Paul A Yushkevich; Alison M Pouch Journal: Stat Atlases Comput Models Heart Date: 2019-02-14
Authors: Alex V Nguyen; Andras Lasso; Hannah H Nam; Jennifer Faerber; Ahmed H Aly; Alison M Pouch; Adam B Scanlan; Francis X McGowan; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Meryl S Cohen; John Simpson; Gabor Fichtinger; Matthew A Jolley Journal: J Am Soc Echocardiogr Date: 2019-02-28 Impact factor: 5.251
Authors: Samuel Frishman; Ali Kight; Ileana Pirozzi; Sainiteesh Maddineni; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Zulekha Karachiwalla; Michael J Paulsen; Alexander D Kaiser; Y Joseph Woo; Mark R Cutkosky Journal: J Med Device Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 0.743
Authors: Marcell J Tjørnild; Lisa Carlson Hanse; Søren N Skov; Karen B Poulsen; Mona Sharghbin; Leila L Benhassen; Diana M Røpcke; Sten L Nielsen; J Michael Hasenkam Journal: Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg Date: 2021-05-27
Authors: Hannah H Nam; Patrick V Dinh; Andras Lasso; Christian Herz; Jing Huang; Adriana Posada; Ahmed H Aly; Alison M Pouch; Saleha Kabir; John Simpson; Andrew C Glatz; David M Harrild; Gerald Marx; Gabor Fichtinger; Meryl S Cohen; Matthew A Jolley Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2020-12-24 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Ahmad A Abdouni; Carlos M A Brandão; Carlos E Rochitte; Pablo M A Pomerantzeff; Elinthon T Veronese; Ariane B Pacheco; Antonio S Santis; Flávio Tarasoutchi; Fábio B Jatene Journal: Clinics (Sao Paulo) Date: 2020-11-27 Impact factor: 2.365
Authors: Andras Lasso; Christian Herz; Hannah Nam; Alana Cianciulli; Steve Pieper; Simon Drouin; Csaba Pinter; Samuelle St-Onge; Chad Vigil; Stephen Ching; Kyle Sunderland; Gabor Fichtinger; Ron Kikinis; Matthew A Jolley Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-09-06