Literature DB >> 24090116

Risk factors for wound disruption following cesarean delivery.

Akila Subramaniam1, Victoria C Jauk, Dana Figueroa, Joseph R Biggio, John Owen, Alan T N Tita.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors for post-cesarean wound infection, but not disruption, are well-described in the literature. The primary objective of this study was to identify risk factors for non-infectious post-cesarean wound disruption.
METHODS: Secondary analysis was conducted using data from a single-center randomized controlled trial of staple versus suture skin closure in women ≥24 weeks' gestation undergoing cesarean delivery. Wound disruption was defined as subcutaneous skin or fascial dehiscence excluding primary wound infections. Composite wound morbidity (disruption or infection) was examined as a secondary outcome. Patient demographics, medical co-morbidities, and intrapartum characteristics were evaluated as potential risk factors using multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS: Of the 398 randomized patients, 340, including 26 with disruptions (7.6%) met inclusion criteria and were analyzed. After multivariable adjustments, African-American race (aOR 3.9, 95% CI 1.1-13.8) and staple - as opposed to suture - wound closure (aOR 5.4, 95% CI 1.8-16.1) remained significant risk factors for disruption; non-significant increases were observed for body mass index ≥30 (aOR 2.1, 95% CI 0.6-7.5), but not for diabetes mellitus (aOR 0.9, 95% CI 0.3-2.9). RESULTS for composite wound morbidity were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Skin closure with staples, African-American race, and considering the relatively small sample size, potentially obesity are associated with increased risk of non-infectious post-cesarean wound disruption.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean; risk factors; wound disruption

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24090116     DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2013.850487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  3 in total

1.  Effect of pulsed high intensity laser therapy on delayed caesarean section healing in diabetic women.

Authors:  Ali Abd El-Monsif Thabet; Hesham Galal Mahran; Anwar Abdelgayed Ebid; Mansour Abdullah Alshehri
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 2.  A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Wound Complications after a Caesarean Section in Obese Women.

Authors:  Aneta Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak; Jacek Krzysztof Szymański; Łukasz Jóźwiak; Beata Sarecka-Hujar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  Effect of Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Standard Wound Dressing on Surgical-Site Infection in Obese Women After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Methodius G Tuuli; Jingxia Liu; Alan T N Tita; Sherri Longo; Amanda Trudell; Ebony B Carter; Anthony Shanks; Candice Woolfolk; Aaron B Caughey; David K Warren; Anthony O Odibo; Graham Colditz; George A Macones; Lorie Harper
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 56.272

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.