| Literature DB >> 24089337 |
Stefan Flasche1, W John Edmunds, Elizabeth Miller, David Goldblatt, Chris Robertson, Yoon Hong Choi.
Abstract
More than 90 capsular serotypes of Streptococcus pneumoniae coexist despite competing for nasopharyngeal carriage and a gradient in fitness. The underlying mechanisms for this are poorly understood and make assessment of the likely population impact of vaccination challenging. We use an individual-based simulation model to generalize widely used deterministic models for pneumococcal competition and show that in these models short-term serotype-specific and serotype non-specific immunity could constitute the mechanism governing between-host competition and coexistence. We find that non-specific immunity induces between-host competition and that serotype-specific immunity limits a type's competitive advantage and allows stable coexistence of multiple serotypes. Serotypes carried at low prevalence show high variance in carriage levels, which would result in apparent outbreaks if they were highly pathogenic. Vaccination against few serotypes can lead to elimination of the vaccine types and induces replacement by others. However, in simulations where the elimination of the targeted types is achieved only by a combination of vaccine effects and the competitive pressure of the non-vaccine types, a universal vaccine with similar-type-specific effectiveness can fail to eliminate pneumococcal carriage and offers limited herd immunity. Hence, if vaccine effects are insufficient to control the majority of serotypes at the same time, then exploiting the competitive pressure by selective vaccination can help control the most pathogenic serotypes.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus pneumoniae; carriage; coexistence; competition; immunity; vaccination
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24089337 PMCID: PMC3790488 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2013.1939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 1.The impact of specific immunity, non-specific immunity and carriage duration on serotype coexistence in the community and the proportion of multiple carriage within the individuals. (a) The number of stably coexisting serotypes in the population (low FOI scenario) depending on the duration of non-specific and specific immunity. The parameter space of high fractions of the population colonized with more than one serotype at a time is indicated by white solid lines. The dashed line marks the space where at least 5% (at least one serotype, typically the most prevalent one) of all serotypes shows cyclic behaviour induced by long duration of immunity. (b) Positive correlation of the number of coexisting serotypes and the mean duration of specific immunity for scenarios of a fixed mean duration of non-specific immunity. (c) Negative correlation of the number of coexisting serotypes and the mean duration of non-specific immunity for scenarios of a fixed mean duration of specific immunity. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 2.The variance of the serotypes’ standardized prevalence after the burn-in period (mid FOI scenario; mean-specific immunity duration: 18 weeks, mean non-specific immunity duration: 10 weeks, 11 serotypes were found to stably coexist in this scenario). Serotypes at the verge of extinction show relatively high deviation from their mean prevalence and peaks may stretch over several years. (Online version in colour.)
Figure 3.Equilibrium mean prevalence of different serotypes by age group (<10 years of age = children, others = adults) under different vaccination programmes: a bivalent vaccine targeting the two most prevalent types (VT1), and an universal vaccine (VT2) with the same efficacy per type. The duration of non-specific and specific immunity was nine and 18 weeks, respectively. (Online version in colour.)