Literature DB >> 24088902

Timing of temporary right ventricular assist device insertion for severe right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation.

Koji Takeda1, Yoshifumi Naka, Jonathan A Yang, Nir Uriel, Paolo C Colombo, Ulrich P Jorde, Hiroo Takayama.   

Abstract

Data on how the timing of a temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) insertion affects outcome are limited in patients receiving left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Of the 282 patients who underwent LVAD placement between January 2000 and November 2010, 40 (14%) required concomitant (n = 26) or delayed (n = 14) RVAD insertion as temporary support. We analyzed early and 1-year outcomes. Preoperative variables were similar in the concomitant and delayed RVAD groups. The hospital mortality rate was approximately 50% in both groups (p = 0.82). The 1-year actuarial survival was similar in both groups (p = 0.42). Patients who required RVAD support had higher in-hospital mortality and worse 1-year survival rates than those who received LVAD only (48% vs. 9.5%, p < 0.0001; 40% vs. 82%, p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated RVAD use as a significant risk factor for 1-year mortality (odds ratio, 18; p = 0.0003; 95% confidence interval, 3.765-86.74). Timing of temporary RVAD insertion did not affect overall survival. Necessity of RVAD support is associated with significantly worse early and late mortality at any rate. The decision to place the RVAD can be made once it is clinically necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24088902     DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0b013e3182a816d1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ASAIO J        ISSN: 1058-2916            Impact factor:   2.872


  7 in total

1.  Successful support of biventricular heart failure patients by new EXCOR® Adult pumps with bileaflet valves: a prospective study.

Authors:  Bastian Schmack; Alexander Weymann; Frank Ruschitzka; Rüdiger Autschbach; Philip W Raake; Nadine Jurrmann; Ares K Menon; Matthias Karck; Markus J Wilhelm; Arjang Ruhparwar
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Comparison of continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow left ventricular assist devices: is there an advantage to pulsatility?

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Christine A Williamitis; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-11

3.  Temporary assist device support for the right ventricle: pre-implant and post-implant challenges.

Authors:  Michael Dandel; Roland Hetzer
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  2019 EACTS Expert Consensus on long-term mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Evgenij V Potapov; Christiaan Antonides; Maria G Crespo-Leiro; Alain Combes; Gloria Färber; Margaret M Hannan; Marian Kukucka; Nicolaas de Jonge; Antonio Loforte; Lars H Lund; Paul Mohacsi; Michiel Morshuis; Ivan Netuka; Mustafa Özbaran; Federico Pappalardo; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Martin Schweiger; Steven Tsui; Daniel Zimpfer; Finn Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  Temporary Right-Ventricular Assist Devices: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahmoud Abdelshafy; Kadir Caliskan; Goksel Guven; Ahmed Elkoumy; Hagar Elsherbini; Hesham Elzomor; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Sakir Akin; Osama Soliman
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Contemporary outcomes of continuous-flow biventricular assist devices.

Authors:  James Farag; Kei Woldendorp; Nicholas McNamara; Paul G Bannon; Silvana F Marasco; Antonio Loforte; Evgenij V Potapov
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-05

7.  Percutaneous venopulmonary artery extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for right heart failure after left ventricular assist device insertion.

Authors:  Yashutosh Joshi; Marie-Cecile Bories; Nadia Aissaoui; Jean-Michel Grinda; Alain Bel; Christian Latremouille; Jérôme Jouan
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-11-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.