Literature DB >> 2408875

A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I-V: results of a spatio-temporal dipole model.

M Scherg, D von Cramon.   

Abstract

Brain-stem auditory evoked potential (BAEP) scalp distribution, recorded in 10 normal subjects, was analysed using a spatio-temporal dipole model. This model can simulate surface wave forms due to overlapping activity from multiple dipolar sources within a 3-shell head model. The conventional 5-peak (I-V) hypothesis could not fully account for the experimental BAEP distribution, particularly around waves I- and III-. When the temporal course of dipole strength was modelled according to a triphasic compound action potential, 6 dipolar sources were sufficient to fit all BAEP wave forms. Location, orientation and latency of the dipoles indicated generation of dipole 1 at the distal end of the auditory nerve (AN), of dipole III in, or near to, the cochlear nucleus (CN), of dipole III- in the trapezoid body and of dipoles IV and V in the superior olivary complexes and in the lateral lemnisci. Dipole I-, peaking only 0.65 msec after wave I, is suggested to result from the electric inhomogeneity at the porus acusticus internus. Wave II required no extra model dipole, but was attributable, in part, to the second peak of dipole I. Estimation of latencies based on AN conduction velocity, synaptic delay and differences in AN length amongst species confirmed that second order neuronal activity cannot arise before wave III. Second order axons, spreading widely through the brain-stem, apparently cause major contributions also to waves III-, IV and V. The new source hypothesis must leave open questions concerning the amount of contribution from third order neurones or from ipsi- versus contralateral structures to the IV/V wave complex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2408875     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(85)90006-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  40 in total

1.  A cross-sectional study on the brainstem auditory evoked potential among workers exposed to carbon disulfide.

Authors:  M Hirata; Y Ogawa; A Okayama; S Goto
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Bimodal speech: early suppressive visual effects in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Julien Besle; Alexandra Fort; Claude Delpuech; Marie-Hélène Giard
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  Evolution of neuromagnetic topographic mapping.

Authors:  S J Williamson; L Kaufman
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Abnormal auditory mismatch fields are associated with communication impairment in both verbal and minimally verbal/nonverbal children who have autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Junko Matsuzaki; Emily S Kuschner; Lisa Blaskey; Luke Bloy; Mina Kim; Matthew Ku; James Christopher Edgar; David Embick; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  Use of prior knowledge in brain electromagnetic source analysis.

Authors:  M Scherg; P Berg
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  EEG dipole modeling in complex partial epilepsy.

Authors:  J S Ebersole
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Sources of auditory brainstem responses revisited: contribution by magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Lauri Parkkonen; Nobuya Fujiki; Jyrki P Mäkelä
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  The propagation potential. An axonal response with implications for scalp-recorded EEG.

Authors:  A P Rudell; S E Fox
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Superior temporal gyrus spectral abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  J Christopher Edgar; Faith M Hanlon; Ming-Xiong Huang; Michael P Weisend; Robert J Thoma; Bruce Carpenter; Karsten Hoechstetter; José M Cañive; Gregory A Miller
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Experimental analyses of the source of ABR wave II.

Authors:  C Tait; J Miller; Y Cycowicz; H Sohmer
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1987
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.