Literature DB >> 24086872

Umbilical cord coiling index and perinatal outcome.

Nivedita S Patil1, Sunanda R Kulkarni, Renu Lohitashwa.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the perinatal outcome with the abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. STUDY
DESIGN: This prospective study was carried out in the department of OBG at Adichunchangiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B.G.Nagara, Mandya, Karnataka, India from January 2008 to August 2010. 200 patients who were in active labour with term gestations, irrespective of their parities, who had singleton pregnancies with live babies who were either delivered by vaginal or LSCS were included in the study. Umbilical cord coiling index was calculated and it was correlated with various perinatal parameters like birth weight, meconium stained liquor, Apgar score, ponderal index and foetal growth restriction. Chi square and Fisher exact tests were used to find the significance of study parameters.
RESULTS: There was a significant correlation between the hypercoiled cords (UCI >90(th) percentile) and IUGR of the babies (p value of < 0.001) and low ponderal indices (a p value of 0.022) Hypocoiled cords ( UCI which was < 10(th) percentile) were significantly associated with meconium staining (p < 0.001), Apgar score at 1 min of <4 and at 5 min of <7 (p value 0.065), LSCS rates (p value of 0.008) and NICU admissions (p <0.001).
CONCLUSION: Hypercoiled cords or UCI which was > 90(th) percentile was associated with IUGR and low ponderal indices. Hypocoiled cords or UCI which was <10th percentile was associated with meconium staining, Apgar score at 1 min of <4 and at 5 min of <7, more LSCS rates and more NICU admissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hypercoiling umbilical cord; Hypocoiling umbilical cord; Umbilical cord coiling index

Year:  2013        PMID: 24086872      PMCID: PMC3782929          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5135.3224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  8 in total

1.  The effect of vascular coiling on venous perfusion during experimental umbilical cord encirclement.

Authors:  H M Georgiou; G E Rice; S P Walker; P Wein; N M Gude; M Permezel
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  The spiral twist of the normal umbilical cord in twins and in singletons.

Authors:  H W EDMONDS
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1954-01       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Umbilical coiling index: is it a marker for the foetus at risk?

Authors:  T Ercal; S Lacin; S Altunyurt; U Saygili; O Cinar; A Mumcu
Journal:  Br J Clin Pract       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug

4.  Umbilical coiling index in normal and complicated pregnancies.

Authors:  Monique W M de Laat; Arie Franx; Michiel L Bots; Gerard H A Visser; Peter G J Nikkels
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Non-coiled umbilical blood vessels: a new marker for the fetus at risk.

Authors:  T H Strong; J P Elliott; T G Radin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  The umbilical coiling index.

Authors:  T H Strong; D L Jarles; J S Vega; D B Feldman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Adverse perinatal outcome in patients with an abnormal umbilical coiling index.

Authors:  J Rana; G A Ebert; K A Kappy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Antepartum diagnosis of noncoiled umbilical cords.

Authors:  T H Strong; H J Finberg; J H Mattox
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.661

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Gestational diabetes mellitus: the correlation between umbilical coiling index, and intrapartum as well as neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Laily Najafi; Azadeh Abedini; Maryam Kadivar; Alireza Khajavi; Arash Bordbar; Amir Hussein Noohi; Banafsheh Mashak; Maryam Hashemnejad; Mohammad E Khamseh; Mojtaba Malek
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab Disord       Date:  2019-04-23

2.  Factors related to morbidity and maternal and perinatal outcomes of umbilical cord torsion.

Authors:  Rongxin Chen; Jianying Yan; Qing Han; Lianghui Zheng
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.