Literature DB >> 24085625

Cost effectiveness of treatments for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: focus on the novel oral anticoagulants.

Charalampos Kasmeridis1, Stavros Apostolakis, Lars Ehlers, Lars H Rasmussen, Giuseppe Boriani, Gregory Y H Lip.   

Abstract

For more than 5 decades, the only available treatment for the prevention of atrial fibrillation (AF)-related stroke were the vitamin K antagonists. Recently, novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) have been approved for the prevention of AF-related stroke. In the present article, the cost effectiveness of AF-related stroke-prevention strategies is reviewed. The emphasis on NOACs aims to provide an overview of their impact on health economics based on the published cost-effectiveness analyses. The available evidence suggests that the balance from the efficacy and safety point of view makes the treatment with the NOACs a cost-effective alternative to warfarin. Thus, the NOACs offer efficacy, safety and convenience, as well as cost effectiveness, for stroke prevention in AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24085625     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-013-0090-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  35 in total

1.  Dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in atrial fibrillation: NICE guidance.

Authors:  Yousif Ahmad; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  Hooman Kamel; S Claiborne Johnston; J Donald Easton; Anthony S Kim
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  James V Freeman; Ruo P Zhu; Douglas K Owens; Alan M Garber; David W Hutton; Alan S Go; Paul J Wang; Mintu P Turakhia
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Secular trends in incidence of atrial fibrillation in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1980 to 2000, and implications on the projections for future prevalence.

Authors:  Yoko Miyasaka; Marion E Barnes; Bernard J Gersh; Stephen S Cha; Kent R Bailey; Walter P Abhayaratna; James B Seward; Teresa S M Tsang
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden.

Authors:  Thomas Davidson; Magnus Husberg; Magnus Janzon; Jonas Oldgren; Lars-Åke Levin
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Assessing the direct costs of treating nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the United States.

Authors:  Karin S Coyne; Clark Paramore; Susan Grandy; Marco Mercader; Matthew Reynolds; Peter Zimetbaum
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

7.  Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert G Hart; Lesly A Pearce; Maria I Aguilar
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Greater stroke severity predominates over all other factors for the worse outcome of cardioembolic stroke.

Authors:  Keun-Sik Hong; Juneyoung Lee; Hee-Joon Bae; Ji Sung Lee; Dong-Wha Kang; Kyung-Ho Yu; Moon-Ku Han; Yong-Jin Cho; Pamela Song; Jong-Moo Park; Mi-Sun Oh; Jaseong Koo; Byung-Chul Lee
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in Spain.

Authors:  José R González-Juanatey; José Álvarez-Sabin; José M Lobos; Antoni Martínez-Rubio; Joan C Reverter; Itziar Oyagüez; Nuria González-Rojas; Virginia Becerra
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed)       Date:  2012-09-06

10.  Costs of atrial fibrillation in five European countries: results from the Euro Heart Survey on atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Anna Ringborg; Robby Nieuwlaat; Peter Lindgren; Bengt Jönsson; Dogan Fidan; Aldo P Maggioni; Jose Lopez-Sendon; Janina Stepinska; Dennis V Cokkinos; Harry J G M Crijns
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 5.214

View more
  10 in total

1.  Exploring indications for the Use of direct oral anticoagulants and the associated risks of major bleeding.

Authors:  Truman J Milling; Jennifer Frontera
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Cost effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation depending on the quality of warfarin anticoagulation control.

Authors:  Andrej Janzic; Mitja Kos
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Potential use of NOACs in developing countries: pros and cons.

Authors:  Durga Bista; Leanne Chalmers; Luke Bereznicki; Gregory Peterson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  PCSK9 Inhibitors Show Value for Patients and the US Health Care System.

Authors:  Wei-Han Cheng; Étienne Gaudette; Dana P Goldman
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 5.  Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: new choices for patient management in atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Walid Saliba
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Drugs       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.571

Review 6.  European Primary Care Cardiovascular Society (EPCCS) consensus guidance on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (SPAF) in primary care.

Authors:  Fd Richard Hobbs; Clare J Taylor; Geert Jan Geersing; Frans H Rutten; Judith R Brouwer
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 7.804

7.  Quality of Anticoagulation with Warfarin in Korean Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Prior Stroke: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Keun Sik Hong; Yang Ki Kim; Hee Joon Bae; Hyo Suk Nam; Sun U Kwon; Oh Young Bang; Jae Kwan Cha; Byung Woo Yoon; Joung Ho Rha; Byung Chul Lee; Jong Moo Park; Man Seok Park; Jun Lee; Jay Chol Choi; Dong Eog Kim; Kyung Bok Lee; Tai Hwan Park; Ji Sung Lee; Seong Eun Kim; Juneyoung Lee
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.077

Review 8.  Non-valvular atrial fibrillation: impact of apixaban on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Adam Ioannou; Irene Tsappa; Sofia Metaxa; Constantinos G Missouris
Journal:  Patient Relat Outcome Meas       Date:  2017-11-03

9.  Cost-effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulant vs. Warfarin Among Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Intermediate Stroke Risk.

Authors:  Ju Hee Choi; Woojin Kim; Yun Tae Kim; Jaelim Cho; Seung Yong Shin; Changsoo Kim; Jin-Bae Kim
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-11

10.  Cost-effectiveness of edoxaban versus rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in the US.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Miller; Xin Ye; Gregory M Lenhart; Amanda M Farr; Oth V Tran; W Jackie Kwong; Elizabeth A Magnuson; William S Weintraub
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2016-05-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.