Literature DB >> 22733833

Cost-effectiveness of dabigatran compared with warfarin for patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden.

Thomas Davidson1, Magnus Husberg, Magnus Janzon, Jonas Oldgren, Lars-Åke Levin.   

Abstract

AIMS: Patients with atrial fibrillation have a significantly increased risk of thromboembolic events such as ischaemic stroke, and patients are therefore recommended to be treated with anticoagulation treatment. The most commonly used anticoagulant consists of vitamin K antagonist such as warfarin. A new oral anticoagulation treatment, dabigatran, has recently been approved for stroke prevention among patients with atrial fibrillation. The purpose of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of dabigatran as preventive treatment of stroke and thromboembolic events compared with warfarin in 65-year-old patients with atrial fibrillation in Sweden. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A decision analytic simulation model was used to estimate the long-term (20-year) costs and effects of the different treatments. The outcome measures are the number of strokes prevented, life years gained, and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. Costs and effect data are adjusted to a Swedish setting. Patients below 80 years of age are assumed to start with dabigatran 150 mg twice a day and switch to 110 mg twice a day at the age of 80 years due to higher bleeding risk. The price of dabigatran in Sweden is €2.82 (Swedish kronor 25.39) per day for both doses. The cost per QALY gained for dabigatran compared with warfarin is estimated at €7742, increasing to €12 449 if dabigatran is compared with only well-controlled warfarin treatment.
CONCLUSION: Dabigatran is a cost-effective treatment in Sweden, as its incremental cost-effectiveness ratio is below the normally accepted willingness to pay limit.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22733833     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  14 in total

Review 1.  New oral anticoagulants: comparative pharmacology with vitamin K antagonists.

Authors:  Francesco Scaglione
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Is dabigatran considered a cost-effective alternative to warfarin treatment: a review of current economic evaluations worldwide.

Authors:  Louise Justesen Hesselbjerg; Heidi Sjoelund Pedersen; Mikael Bergholdt Asmussen; Karin Dam Petersen
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.448

Review 3.  Cost effectiveness of treatments for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: focus on the novel oral anticoagulants.

Authors:  Charalampos Kasmeridis; Stavros Apostolakis; Lars Ehlers; Lars H Rasmussen; Giuseppe Boriani; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Comparison of cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation across countries.

Authors:  Martin Krejczy; Job Harenberg; Svetlana Marx; Konrad Obermann; Lutz Frölich; Martin Wehling
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Dabigatran (150 mg Twice Daily) and Warfarin in Patients ≥ 65 Years With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Brian M Salata; David W Hutton; Deborah A Levine; James B Froehlich; Geoffrey D Barnes
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 6.  Novel anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  Brendan L Limone; William L Baker; Jeffrey Kluger; Craig I Coleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-23       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with edoxaban compared to warfarin in Germany.

Authors:  Martin Krejczy; Job Harenberg; Martin Wehling; Konrad Obermann; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Potential impact of new oral anticoagulants on the management of atrial fibrillation-related stroke in primary care.

Authors:  K Harris; J Mant
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2013-04-28       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Dabigatran - a case history demonstrating the need for comprehensive approaches to optimize the use of new drugs.

Authors:  Rickard E Malmström; Brian B Godman; Eduard Diogene; Christoph Baumgärtel; Marion Bennie; Iain Bishop; Anna Brzezinska; Anna Bucsics; Stephen Campbell; Alessandra Ferrario; Alexander E Finlayson; Jurij Fürst; Kristina Garuoliene; Miguel Gomes; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Alan Haycox; Krystyna Hviding; Harald Herholz; Mikael Hoffmann; Saira Jan; Jan Jones; Roberta Joppi; Marija Kalaba; Christina Kvalheim; Ott Laius; Irene Langner; Julie Lonsdale; Sven-Äke Lööv; Kamila Malinowska; Laura McCullagh; Ken Paterson; Vanda Markovic-Pekovic; Andrew Martin; Jutta Piessnegger; Gisbert Selke; Catherine Sermet; Steven Simoens; Cankat Tulunay; Dominik Tomek; Luka Vončina; Vera Vlahovic-Palcevski; Janet Wale; Michael Wilcock; Magdalena Wladysiuk; Menno van Woerkom; Corrine Zara; Lars L Gustafsson
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 5.810

10.  Dabigatran in the peri-procedural period for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and impact on duration of hospital stay.

Authors:  Kimitake Imamura; Akihiro Yoshida; Asumi Takei; Koji Fukuzawa; Kunihiko Kiuchi; Kaoru Takami; Mitsuru Takami; Mitsuaki Itoh; Ryudo Fujiwara; Atsushi Suzuki; Tomoyuki Nakanishi; Soichiro Yamashita; Akinori Matsumoto; Ken-Ichi Hirata
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-14       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.