Katsutoshi Ando1, Mitsuaki Sekiya, Kazunori Tobino, Kazuhisa Takahashi. 1. Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8421, Japan, kando@juntendo.ac.jp.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is increasingly recognized, as current reports of its clinical features show. To determine CPFE's physiologic and radiologic features, we conducted quantitative assessment of computed tomography scans to compare with those of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: In 23 patients with CPFE and 42 patients with COPD, we measured the extent of emphysema (LAA %), parenchymal density, and total cross-sectional areas of pulmonary vessels smaller than 5 mm(2) (%CSA <5) and 5-10 mm(2) (%CSA 5-10). RESULTS: For CPFE, airflow was better, but diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was worse than for COPD, whereas LAA % was similar for both groups. The %CSA <5 was greater but %CSA5-10 was less in CPFE than COPD. COPD involved a negative correlation between DLCO and LAA % at all lung sites; those factors correlated for CPFE only in the upper lobe (r = -0.535). In contrast, CPFE had a negative correlation between DLCO and parenchymal density in lower lobes (r = -0.453), but COPD showed no correlation in any such sections. In CPFE, no correlation was apparent between LAA in upper lobes and parenchymal density in lower lobes. The annual rate of FVC decline (-169.26 ml/year) in CPFE patients correlated with parenchymal density (r = -0.714). CONCLUSIONS: In CPFE, fibrosis and emphysema apparently existed independently, but both correlate with and likely contribute to the disproportionate reduction in gas exchange. Our study also suggested that pulmonary fibrotic changes may be more important contributors than emphysema for disease progression.
PURPOSE: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is increasingly recognized, as current reports of its clinical features show. To determine CPFE's physiologic and radiologic features, we conducted quantitative assessment of computed tomography scans to compare with those of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: In 23 patients with CPFE and 42 patients with COPD, we measured the extent of emphysema (LAA %), parenchymal density, and total cross-sectional areas of pulmonary vessels smaller than 5 mm(2) (%CSA <5) and 5-10 mm(2) (%CSA 5-10). RESULTS: For CPFE, airflow was better, but diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was worse than for COPD, whereas LAA % was similar for both groups. The %CSA <5 was greater but %CSA5-10 was less in CPFE than COPD. COPD involved a negative correlation between DLCO and LAA % at all lung sites; those factors correlated for CPFE only in the upper lobe (r = -0.535). In contrast, CPFE had a negative correlation between DLCO and parenchymal density in lower lobes (r = -0.453), but COPD showed no correlation in any such sections. In CPFE, no correlation was apparent between LAA in upper lobes and parenchymal density in lower lobes. The annual rate of FVC decline (-169.26 ml/year) in CPFEpatients correlated with parenchymal density (r = -0.714). CONCLUSIONS: In CPFE, fibrosis and emphysema apparently existed independently, but both correlate with and likely contribute to the disproportionate reduction in gas exchange. Our study also suggested that pulmonary fibrotic changes may be more important contributors than emphysema for disease progression.
Authors: V Cottin; H Nunes; P-Y Brillet; P Delaval; G Devouassoux; I Tillie-Leblond; D Israel-Biet; I Court-Fortune; D Valeyre; J-F Cordier Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: H Taniguchi; M Ebina; Y Kondoh; T Ogura; A Azuma; M Suga; Y Taguchi; H Takahashi; K Nakata; A Sato; M Takeuchi; G Raghu; S Kudoh; T Nukiwa Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2009-12-08 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: M Mishima; T Hirai; H Itoh; Y Nakano; H Sakai; S Muro; K Nishimura; Y Oku; K Chin; M Ohi; T Nakamura; J H Bates; A M Alencar; B Suki Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 1999-08-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Salud Santos; Victor I Peinado; Josep Ramirez; Jaime Morales-Blanhir; Ricardo Bastos; Josep Roca; Robert Rodriguez-Roisin; Joan A Barbera Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-02-20 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Shin Matsuoka; George R Washko; Mark T Dransfield; Tsuneo Yamashiro; Raul San Jose Estepar; Alejandro Diaz; Edwin K Silverman; Samuel Patz; Hiroto Hatabu Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2009-09-30 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Yong Seek Kim; Gong Yong Jin; Kum Ju Chae; Young Min Han; Su Bin Chon; Young Sun Lee; Keun Sang Kwon; Hye Mi Choi Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Olívia Meira Dias; Bruno Guedes Baldi; André Nathan Costa; Carlos Roberto Ribeiro Carvalho Journal: J Bras Pneumol Date: 2014 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.624
Authors: Corrine R Kliment; Tetsuro Araki; Tracy J Doyle; Wei Gao; Josée Dupuis; Jeanne C Latourelle; Oscar E Zazueta; Isis E Fernandez; Mizuki Nishino; Yuka Okajima; James C Ross; Raúl San José Estépar; Alejandro A Diaz; David J Lederer; David A Schwartz; Edwin K Silverman; Ivan O Rosas; George R Washko; George T O'Connor; Hiroto Hatabu; Gary M Hunninghake Journal: BMC Pulm Med Date: 2015-10-29 Impact factor: 3.317
Authors: Felix W Feldhaus; Dorothea Cornelia Theilig; Ralf-Harto Hubner; Jan-Martin Kuhnigk; Konrad Neumann; Felix Doellinger Journal: Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis Date: 2019-07-17