Literature DB >> 24084757

A coupled sensor-spectrophotometric device for continuous measurement of formaldehyde in indoor environments.

Ellison M Carter1, Mark C Jackson1, Lynn E Katz1, Gerald E Speitel1.   

Abstract

Despite long-standing awareness of adverse health effects associated with chronic human exposure to formaldehyde, this hazardous air pollutant remains a challenge to measure in indoor environments. Traditional analytical techniques evaluate formaldehyde concentrations over several hours to several days in a single location in a residence, making it difficult to characterize daily temporal and spatial variation in human exposure to formaldehyde. There is a need for portable, easy-to-use devices that are specific and sensitive to gas-phase formaldehyde over short sampling periods so that dynamic processes governing formaldehyde fate, transport, and potential remediation in indoor environments may be studied more effectively. A recently developed device couples a chemical sensor element with spectrophotometric analysis for detection and quantification of part per billion (ppbv) gas-phase formaldehyde concentrations. This study established the ability of the coupled sensor-spectrophotometric device (CSSD) to report formaldehyde concentrations accurately and continuously on a 30-min sampling cycle at low ppbv concentrations previously untested for this device in a laboratory setting. Determination of the method detection limit (MDL), based on 40 samples each at test concentrations of 5 and 10 ppbv, was found to be 1.9 and 2.0 ppbv, respectively. Performance of the CSSD was compared with the dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization method for formaldehyde concentrations ranging from 5-50 ppbv, and a linear relationship with a coefficient of determination of 0.983 was found between these two analytical techniques. The CSSD was also used to monitor indoor formaldehyde concentrations in two manufactured homes. During this time, formaldehyde concentrations varied from below detection limit to 65 ppbv and were above the US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recommended exposure limit (REL) of 16 ppbv, which is also the exposure limit value now adopted by the US Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to procure manufactured housing, 80% and 100% of the time, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24084757     DOI: 10.1038/jes.2013.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1559-0631            Impact factor:   5.563


  12 in total

1.  Assessing equivalence: an alternative to the use of difference tests for measuring disparities in vaccination coverage.

Authors:  Lawrence E Barker; Elizabeth T Luman; Mary M McCauley; Susan Y Chu
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2002-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  2006

Review 3.  Aldehyde sources, metabolism, molecular toxicity mechanisms, and possible effects on human health.

Authors:  Peter J O'Brien; Arno G Siraki; Nandita Shangari
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.635

4.  Development of formaldehyde sensing element using porous glass impregnated with beta-diketone.

Authors:  Yasuko Yamada Maruo; Jiro Nakamura; Masahiro Uchiyama
Journal:  Talanta       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 6.057

5.  Sampling and determination of formaldehyde using solid-phase microextraction with on-fiber derivatization.

Authors:  P A Martos; J Pawliszyn
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Residential environmental measurements in the national human exposure assessment survey (NHEXAS) pilot study in Arizona: preliminary results for pesticides and VOCs.

Authors:  S M Gordon; P J Callahan; M G Nishioka; M C Brinkman; M K O'Rourke; M D Lebowitz; D J Moschandreas
Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct

7.  Volatile organic compound concentrations and emission rates in new manufactured and site-built houses.

Authors:  A T Hodgson; A F Rudd; D Beal; S Chandra
Journal:  Indoor Air       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.770

8.  Relationships of Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Air (RIOPA). Part I. Collection methods and descriptive analyses.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel; Junfeng Zhang; Barbara J Turpin; Maria T Morandi; Steven Colome; Thomas H Stock; Dalia M Spektor; Leo Korn; Arthur M Winer; Jaymin Kwon; Qing Yu Meng; Lin Zhang; Robert Harrington; Weili Liu; Adam Reff; Jong Hoon Lee; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Kishan Mohan; Derek Shendell; Jennifer Jones; L Farrar; Slivia Maberti; Tina Fan
Journal:  Res Rep Health Eff Inst       Date:  2005-11

Review 9.  Analysis of industrial contaminants in indoor air: part 1. Volatile organic compounds, carbonyl compounds, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Ruth Barro; Jorge Regueiro; María Llompart; Carmen Garcia-Jares
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.759

10.  Comparison of analytical techniques for the determination of aldehydes in test chambers.

Authors:  Tunga Salthammer; Sibel Mentese
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 7.086

View more
  1 in total

1.  Formaldehyde Concentrations in a Net-Zero Energy House: Real-time Monitoring and Simulation.

Authors:  Dustin Poppendieck; Shahana Khurshid; W Stuart Dols; Lisa Ng; Brian Polidoro; Steve Emmerich
Journal:  Indoor Air Int Conf Indoor Air Qual Clim       Date:  2016-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.