Literature DB >> 10554148

Residential environmental measurements in the national human exposure assessment survey (NHEXAS) pilot study in Arizona: preliminary results for pesticides and VOCs.

S M Gordon1, P J Callahan, M G Nishioka, M C Brinkman, M K O'Rourke, M D Lebowitz, D J Moschandreas.   

Abstract

A major objective of the National Human Exposure Assessment Survey (NHEXAS) performed in Arizona was to conduct residential environmental and biomarker measurements of selected pesticides (chlorpyrifos, diazinon), volatile organic compounds (VOCs; benzene, toluene, trichloroethene, formaldehyde, 1,3-butadiene), and metals for total human exposure assessments. Both personal (e.g., blood, urine, dermal wipes, 24 h duplicate diet) and microenvironmental (e.g., indoor and outdoor air, house dust, foundation soil) samples were collected in each home in order to describe individual exposure via ingestion, inhalation, and dermal pathways, and to extrapolate trends to larger populations. This paper is a preliminary report of only the microenvironmental and dermal wipe data obtained for the target pesticides and VOCs, and provides comparisons with results from similar studies. Evaluations of total exposure from all sources and pathways will be addressed in future papers. The pesticides and VOCs all showed log-normal distributions of concentrations in the Arizona population sampled, and in most cases were detected with sufficient frequency to allow unequivocal description of the concentration by media at the 90th, 75th, and 50th (median) percentiles. Those combinations of pollutant and media, in which a large fraction of the measurements were below the detection limit of the analysis method used, included trichloroethene, 1,3-butadiene, and formaldehyde in outdoor air; chlorpyrifos and diazinon in outdoor air; and diazinon in dermal and window sill wipes. In general, indoor air concentrations were higher than outdoor air concentrations for all VOCs and pesticides investigated, and VOC levels were in good agreement with levels reported in other studies. In addition, the agreement obtained between co-located VOC samplers indicated that the low-cost diffusional badges used to measure concentrations are probably adequate for use in future monitoring studies. For the pesticides, the median levels found in indoor samples agreed well with other studies, although the levels corresponding to the upper 0.1-1% of the population were considerably higher than levels reported elsewhere, with indoor air levels as high as 3.3 and 20.5 microg/m3 for chlorpyrifos and diazinon, respectively. These data showed excellent correlation (Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.998 and 0.998, respectively) between chlorpyrifos in indoor air and in the corresponding dermal wipes, and relatively poor correlation between chlorpyrifos in dust (microg/g or microg/ml) and dermal wipes (Pearson=0.055 microg/g and 0.015 microg/m2; Spearman=0.644 microg/g and 0.578 microg/m2). These data suggest the importance of dermal penetration of semi-volatiles as a route of residential human exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10554148     DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol        ISSN: 1053-4245


  28 in total

1.  Indoor/ambient residential air toxics results in rural western Montana.

Authors:  Tony J Ward; Heidi Underberg; David Jones; Raymond F Hamilton; Earle Adams
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Comparison of wipe materials and wetting agents for pesticide residue collection from hard surfaces.

Authors:  Nicole C Deziel; Susan M Viet; John W Rogers; David E Camann; David A Marker; Maire S A Heikkinen; Alice Y Yau; Daniel M Stout; Michael Dellarco
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  An overview of boron, lithium, and strontium in human health and profiles of these elements in urine of Japanese.

Authors:  Kan Usuda; Koichi Kono; Tomotaro Dote; Misuzu Watanabe; Hiroyasu Shimizu; Yoshimi Tanimoto; Emi Yamadori
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.674

4.  Estimation of the daily soil/dust (SD) ingestion rate of children from Gansu Province, China via hand-to-mouth contact using tracer elements.

Authors:  Jin Ma; Li-Bo Pan; Qin Wang; Chun-Ye Lin; Xiao-Li Duan; Hong Hou
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 4.609

5.  Differences in metal concentration by particle size in house dust and soil.

Authors:  Paloma I Beamer; Christina A Elish; Denise J Roe; Miranda M Loh; David W Layton
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-01-16

6.  Modeling of personal exposures to ambient air toxics in Camden, New Jersey: an evaluation study.

Authors:  Sheng-Wei Wang; Xiaogang Tang; Zhi-Hua Fan; Xiangmei Wu; Paul J Lioy; Panos G Georgopoulos
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.235

7.  A coupled sensor-spectrophotometric device for continuous measurement of formaldehyde in indoor environments.

Authors:  Ellison M Carter; Mark C Jackson; Lynn E Katz; Gerald E Speitel
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.563

8.  Indoor air VOC concentrations in suburban and rural New Jersey.

Authors:  Clifford P Weisel; Shahnaz Alimokhtari; Paul F Sanders
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

9.  Exposure to flame retardant chemicals on commercial airplanes.

Authors:  Joseph G Allen; Heather M Stapleton; Jose Vallarino; Eileen McNeely; Michael D McClean; Stuart J Harrad; Cassandra B Rauert; John D Spengler
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 5.984

10.  Cancer risk disparities between hispanic and non-hispanic white populations: the role of exposure to indoor air pollution.

Authors:  Diana E Hun; Jeffrey A Siegel; Maria T Morandi; Thomas H Stock; Richard L Corsi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.