Literature DB >> 24084289

Expanding relevance of aortic valve repair-is earlier operation indicated?

Vikas Sharma1, Rakesh M Suri2, Joseph A Dearani1, Harold M Burkhart1, Soon J Park1, Lyle D Joyce1, Zhuo Li3, Hartzell V Schaff1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To define the durability of aortic valve repair (AVRep) and the effect of surgical timing on late survival.
METHODS: From June 1986 to June 2011, 331 patients underwent elective AVRep for aortic regurgitation (mean age, 53 ± 17 years; 76% men). The repair methods included commissuroplasty (n = 270; 81%), triangular resection and plication (n = 106; 32%), resuspension or cusp shortening (n = 102; 31%), and perforation closure (n = 23; 7%).
RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 0.6% (2 of 332). Four patients (1%) experienced early repair failure; two underwent repeat repair. Overall survival was 91% and 81% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. After adjusting for age, greater left ventricular end-systolic dimension (per 5 mm; hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-1.79; P < .001) and lower ejection fraction (per 5%; HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.25-1.63; P ≤ .001) were significant predictors of long-term mortality. Patients with ejection fraction < 50% and left ventricular end-systolic dimension > 50 mm had significantly greater odds of late death (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.05-5.82; P < .001 and HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.05-4.12; P = .036, respectively). The risk of aortic valve reoperation was 10% and 21% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. The presence of severe aortic regurgitation (HR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-5.06; P = .02) and more than mild regurgitation at discharge (HR, 5.87; 95% CI, 2.67-12.68; P ≤ .0001) were predictors of late reoperation. Freedom from other valve-related events was 94% and 91% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Forty-seven patients (21%) with intact valve repair were using warfarin at the last follow-up visit.
CONCLUSIONS: AVRep can be performed with excellent late survival and freedom from valve-related events. Awaiting the onset of ventricular dysfunction increases the risk of late mortality, warranting earlier consideration of AVRep for patients with suitable anatomy.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  35; AR; AVR; AVR(ep); CI; EF; HR; LVESD; aortic regurgitation; aortic valve repair; aortic valve replacement; confidence interval; ejection fraction; hazard ratio; left ventricular end-systolic dimension

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24084289     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  5 in total

1.  Can the Results of Aortic Valve Repair Equal the Results of a Biologic Aortic Valve Replacement?

Authors:  Mohamad Bashir; Aung Oo; Ruggero De Paulis; Michael A Borger; Gebrine El Khoury; Joseph Bavaria; John A Elefteraides
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2014-02-01

Review 2.  Aortic valve repair update.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Komiya
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-05

Review 3.  Aortic valve repair for aortic regurgitation and preoperative echocardiographic assessment.

Authors:  Takashi Kunihara
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 4.  Aortic valve repair: indications and outcomes.

Authors:  Munir Boodhwani; Gebrine El Khoury
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Bicuspid aortic valve repair using geometric ring annuloplasty: A first-in-humans pilot trial.

Authors:  J Scott Rankin; Domenico Mazzitelli; Theodor J M Fischlein; Yeong-Hoon Choi; Diana Aicher; Lawrence M Wei; Vinay Badhwar
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-01-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.