| Literature DB >> 24083203 |
Rajni Bala1, Sushil Khanna, Pravin K Pawar.
Abstract
Clobazam is a newer 1,5-benzodiazepine used for the treatment of epilepsy. It is better tolerated and less sedating than other benzodiazepines. Absorption of the drug can be impacted by oral fast dissolving dosage form; this may have implications for epilepsy in pediatrics and those having difficulty in swallowing tablets/capsules resulting in improved patient compliance. The purpose of the present investigation was to formulate and optimize clobazam oro-dissolving tablets by direct compression method using response surface methodology (RSM). Oro-dispersible tablets of clobazam were prepared by direct compression method using crospovidone (2-6%) as a superdisintegrant, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) (20-40%) was used as diluents along with directly compressible mannitol to enhance mouth feel. A 3(2) full factorial design was applied to investigate the combined effect of two formulation variables: amount of crospovidone and MCC over the independent variables disintegration time, wetting time and percent drug release. Disintegration time showed by all formulations was found to be in the range of 24.3-193 s based on evaluation parameters the formulation containing 6% of crospovidone and 30% of MCC showed promising performance against all other formulations. The results demonstrated that the RSM could efficiently be applied for the formulation of clobazam oro-dispersible tablets; therefore, constitute an advance in the management of epileptic attacks.Entities:
Keywords: Antiepileptics; crospovidone; disintegration; microcrystalline cellulose; response surface methodology
Year: 2013 PMID: 24083203 PMCID: PMC3777306 DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.116785
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Pharm Technol Res ISSN: 0976-2094
32 factorial design layout
Composition of oro-dispersible tablets of clobazam using 32 factorial design
Figure 1Fourier transform infrared spectra of (a) clobazam, (b) crospovidon, (c) physical mixture of clobazam and crospovidon, (d) optimized formulation (F17)
Evaluation of factorial design formulations of clobazam tablets
Figure 2Comparative in vitro drug release profile of factorial design formulation batches F10-F18 of clobazam tablet. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n= 3)
Figure 3Comparative in vitro drug release profile of optimized formulation (F17) and marketed formulation of clobazam. Data are represented as mean ± SD (n= 3)
Figure 4Scanning electron microscopy of (a) cross-sectional surface of optimized formulation (F17) of clobazam, (b) cross-sectional surface of formulation F17, (c) sectional surface of formulation F17 (without superdisintegrant)
Regression coefficient (r2) values of drug release data obtained from various kinetic models and ‘n’ value (diffusional exponent) according to Korsmeyer-Peppas model
ANOVA for all three responses
Summary of regression analysis results
Figure 5Response surface plot showing the influence of diluent microcrystalline cellulose and superdisintegrant (cp) over (a) disintegrantion time, (b) wetting time, (c) % drug release
Comparison between one marketed product and selected formulation (F17)