| Literature DB >> 22171305 |
Shailendra Singh Solanki1, Rashmi Dahima.
Abstract
Aceclofenac has been shown to have potent analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities similar to indomethacin and diclofenac, and due to its preferential Cox-2 blockade, it has a better safety than conventional Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) with respect to adverse effect on gastrointestinal and cardiovascular systems. Aceclofenac is superior from other NSAIDs as it has selectivity for Cox-2, a beneficial Cox inhibitor is well tolerated, has better Gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and improved cardiovascular safety when compared with other selective Cox-2 inhibitor. To provide the patient with the most convenient mode of administration, there is need to develop a fast-disintegrating dosage form, particularly one that disintegrates and dissolves/disperses in saliva and can be administered without water, anywhere, any time. Such tablets are also called as "melt in mouth tablet." Direct compression, freeze drying, sublimation, spray drying, tablet molding, disintegrant addition, and use of sugar-based excipients are technologies available for mouth-dissolving tablet. Mouth-dissolving tablets of aceclofenac were prepared with two different techniques, wet granulation and direct compression, in which different formulations were prepared with varying concentration of excipients. These tablets were evaluated for their friability, hardness, wetting time, and disintegration time; the drug release profile was studied in buffer Phosphate buffered Saline (PBS) pH 7.4. Direct compression batch C3 gave far better dissolution than the wet granulation Batch F2, which released only 75.37% drug, and C3, which released 89.69% drug in 90 minutes.Entities:
Keywords: Aceclofenac; dry granulation; geriatric; mouth-dissolving tablet; pediatric; wet granulation
Year: 2011 PMID: 22171305 PMCID: PMC3217689 DOI: 10.4103/2231-4040.82951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Pharm Technol Res ISSN: 0976-2094
Design layout and evaluation of different formulations prepared with avicel by wet granulation
Prepared A1 formulation passed through the different mess size
Evaluation of formulation after direct compression
To check the consistency of formulation C3, three validation trials [D1-D3] evaluation
Comparative dissolution profile of formulation F1, F2, F3, and C3
Figure 1Graphical representation of comparative dissolution profile of batch F1, F2, F3, and C3. F1: Wet granulation; F2: Wet granulation; F3: Wet granulation; C3: Direct compression