Literature DB >> 24080673

GAP-REACH: a checklist to assess comprehensive reporting of race, ethnicity, and culture in psychiatric publications.

Roberto Lewis-Fernández1, Greer A Raggio, Magdaliz Gorritz, Naihua Duan, Sue Marcus, Leopoldo J Cabassa, Jennifer Humensky, Anne E Becker, Renato D Alarcón, María A Oquendo, Helena Hansen, Robert C Like, Mitchell Weiss, Prakash N Desai, Frederick M Jacobsen, Edward F Foulks, Annelle Primm, Francis Lu, Alex Kopelowicz, Ladson Hinton, Devon E Hinton.   

Abstract

Growing awareness of health and health care disparities highlights the importance of including information about race, ethnicity, and culture (REC) in health research. Reporting of REC factors in research publications, however, is notoriously imprecise and unsystematic. This article describes the development of a checklist to assess the comprehensiveness and the applicability of REC factor reporting in psychiatric research publications. The 16-item GAP-REACH checklist was developed through a rigorous process of expert consensus, empirical content analysis in a sample of publications (N = 1205), and interrater reliability (IRR) assessment (N = 30). The items assess each section in the conventional structure of a health research article. Data from the assessment may be considered on an item-by-item basis or as a total score ranging from 0% to 100%. The final checklist has excellent IRR (κ = 0.91). The GAP-REACH may be used by multiple research stakeholders to assess the scope of REC reporting in a research article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24080673      PMCID: PMC4324559          DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3182a5c184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis        ISSN: 0022-3018            Impact factor:   2.254


  32 in total

Review 1.  Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.

Authors:  D Moher; D J Cook; S Eastwood; I Olkin; D Rennie; D F Stroup
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-11-27       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Race/ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status-research exploring their effects on child health: a subject review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Adherence disparities in mental health: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Lisa Dixon; Roberto Lewis-Fernandez; Howard Goldman; Alejandro Interian; Anne Michaels; Marion Crawford Kiley
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy.

Authors:  James H Kocsis; Andrew J Gerber; Barbara Milrod; Steven P Roose; Jacques Barber; Michael E Thase; Patrick Perkins; Andrew C Leon
Journal:  Compr Psychiatry       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 3.735

Review 5.  Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review.

Authors:  David Moher; Laura Weeks; Mary Ocampo; Dugald Seely; Margaret Sampson; Douglas G Altman; Kenneth F Schulz; Donald Miller; Iveta Simera; Jeremy Grimshaw; John Hoey
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  "Race" and "ethnicity" in biomedical research: how do scientists construct and explain differences in health?

Authors:  Catherine Lee
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group.

Authors:  D F Stroup; J A Berlin; S C Morton; I Olkin; G D Williamson; D Rennie; D Moher; B J Becker; T A Sipe; S B Thacker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-19       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Principles for research on ethnicity and health: the Leeds Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Ghazala Mir; Sarah Salway; Joe Kai; Saffron Karlsen; Raj Bhopal; George Th Ellison; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-07-21

10.  Reporting and methodologic quality of Cochrane Neonatal review group systematic reviews.

Authors:  Khalid Al Faleh; Mohammed Al-Omran
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.125

View more
  4 in total

1.  Confronting Racism in All Forms of Pain Research: A Shared Commitment for Engagement, Diversity, and Dissemination.

Authors:  Anna M Hood; Staja Q Booker; Calia A Morais; Burel R Goodin; Janelle E Letzen; Lisa C Campbell; Ericka N Merriwether; Edwin N Aroke; Claudia M Campbell; Vani A Mathur; Mary R Janevic
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 5.383

2.  Predicting response to cognitive training for schizophrenia using results from two studies with different outcomes.

Authors:  Alice M Saperstein; C Jean Choi; Carol Jahshan; David A Lynch; Melanie Wall; Michael F Green; Alice Medalia
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Clinical value of the cultural formulation interview in Pune, India.

Authors:  Vasudeo P Paralikar; Sanjeev B Sarmukaddam; Kanak V Patil; Amit D Nulkar; Mitchell G Weiss
Journal:  Indian J Psychiatry       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.759

4.  NICE shared decision making guidelines and mental health: challenges for research, practice and implementation.

Authors:  Yaara Zisman-Ilani; Marta Chmielowska; Lisa B Dixon; Shulamit Ramon
Journal:  BJPsych Open       Date:  2021-09-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.