Zoë Tieges1, Aisling McGrath, Roanna J Hall, Alasdair M J Maclullich. 1. Edinburgh Delirium Research Group, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom; Centre for Cognitive Ageing and Cognitive Epidemiology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Zoe.Tieges@ed.ac.uk.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Abnormal level of arousal (LoA) and inattention are key features of delirium. However, the extent to which abnormal LoA alone might predict delirium and inattention is unclear. Here we tested the hypotheses that (1) patients with abnormal LoA have delirium, and (2) abnormal LoA is associated with worse performance on tests of attention. METHODS: Thirty acute hip fracture patients aged 64-97 years underwent assessments of LoA, delirium status, and attentional functioning in the 24 hours before surgery and at 2-4 and 7-10 days after surgery. The Observational Scale of Level of Arousal (OSLA) and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) were used to assess LoA. Sustained attention was measured with the Edinburgh Delirium Test Box. Delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98. RESULTS: Ten patients (33%) were diagnosed with delirium. Abnormal LoA as measured by the OSLA was strongly associated with the presence of delirium. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.97), with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.81. Area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the RASS were 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.94), 0.80, and 0.79, respectively. Abnormal LoA was associated with worse attentional deficits preoperatively and at postoperative days 2-4 (p <0.01). CONCLUSION: These exploratory findings suggest that abnormal LoA is a strong indicator of delirium. Also, abnormal LoA is strongly associated with inattention as measured by an objective cognitive test. These findings suggest that acute-onset abnormal LoA could be used as a trigger for delirium assessment in routine clinical practice. Future work will help to clarify further the interrelationships among abnormal LoA, inattention, and delirium.
OBJECTIVE: Abnormal level of arousal (LoA) and inattention are key features of delirium. However, the extent to which abnormal LoA alone might predict delirium and inattention is unclear. Here we tested the hypotheses that (1) patients with abnormal LoA have delirium, and (2) abnormal LoA is associated with worse performance on tests of attention. METHODS: Thirty acute hip fracture patients aged 64-97 years underwent assessments of LoA, delirium status, and attentional functioning in the 24 hours before surgery and at 2-4 and 7-10 days after surgery. The Observational Scale of Level of Arousal (OSLA) and the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) were used to assess LoA. Sustained attention was measured with the Edinburgh Delirium Test Box. Delirium was assessed with the Confusion Assessment Method and the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98. RESULTS: Ten patients (33%) were diagnosed with delirium. Abnormal LoA as measured by the OSLA was strongly associated with the presence of delirium. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.97), with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.81. Area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity for the RASS were 0.81 (95% confidence interval: 0.68-0.94), 0.80, and 0.79, respectively. Abnormal LoA was associated with worse attentional deficits preoperatively and at postoperative days 2-4 (p <0.01). CONCLUSION: These exploratory findings suggest that abnormal LoA is a strong indicator of delirium. Also, abnormal LoA is strongly associated with inattention as measured by an objective cognitive test. These findings suggest that acute-onset abnormal LoA could be used as a trigger for delirium assessment in routine clinical practice. Future work will help to clarify further the interrelationships among abnormal LoA, inattention, and delirium.
Authors: Sarinnapha M Vasunilashorn; Dena Schulman-Green; Douglas Tommet; Tamara G Fong; Tammy T Hshieh; Edward R Marcantonio; Eran D Metzger; Eva M Schmitt; Patricia A Tabloski; Thomas G Travison; Yun Gou; Benjamin Helfand; Sharon K Inouye; Richard N Jones Journal: Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord Date: 2020-06-17 Impact factor: 2.959
Authors: E Card; P Pandharipande; C Tomes; C Lee; J Wood; D Nelson; A Graves; A Shintani; E W Ely; C Hughes Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2014-12-23 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: John P Corradi; Stephen Thompson; Jeffrey F Mather; Christine M Waszynski; Robert S Dicks Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Andrea M Yevchak; Jin Ho Han; Kelly Doherty; Elizabeth G Archambault; Brittany Kelly; Rameela Chandrasekhar; E Wesley Ely; James L Rudolph Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-03-03 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Cameron Green; Kirsty Hendry; Elizabeth S Wilson; Timothy Walsh; Mike Allerhand; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Zoë Tieges Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Tamara G Fong; Annie M Racine; Donna M Fick; Patricia Tabloski; Yun Gou; Eva M Schmitt; Tammy T Hshieh; Eran Metzger; Sylvie E Bertrand; Edward R Marcantonio; Richard N Jones; Sharon K Inouye Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2019-10-12 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jin H Han; Eduard E Vasilevskis; John F Schnelle; Ayumi Shintani; Robert S Dittus; Amanda Wilson; E Wesley Ely Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2015-06-25 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jin H Han; Nathan E Brummel; Rameela Chandrasekhar; Jo Ellen Wilson; Xulei Liu; Eduard E Vasilevskis; Timothy D Girard; Maria E Carlo; Robert S Dittus; John F Schnelle; E Wesley Ely Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 4.105