Literature DB >> 24080285

Instruments for measuring mental health recovery: a systematic review.

Marisa Sklar1, Erik J Groessl, Maria O'Connell, Larry Davidson, Gregory A Aarons.   

Abstract

Persons in recovery, providers, and policymakers alike are advocating for recovery-oriented mental health care, with the promotion of recovery becoming a prominent feature of mental health policy in the United States and internationally. One step toward creating a recovery-oriented system of care is to use recovery-oriented outcome measures. Numerous instruments have been developed to assess progress towards mental health recovery. This review identifies instruments of mental health recovery and evaluates the appropriateness of their use including their psychometric properties, ease of administration, and service-user involvement in their development. A literature search using the Medline and Psych-INFO databases was conducted, identifying 21 instruments for potential inclusion in this review, of which thirteen met inclusion criteria. Results suggest only three instruments (25%) have had their psychometric properties assessed in three or more unique samples of participants. Ease of administration varied between instruments, and for the majority of instruments, development included service user involvement. This review updates and expands previous reviews of instruments to assess mental health recovery. As mental health care continues to transform to a recovery-oriented model of service delivery, this review may facilitate selection of appropriate assessments of mental health recovery for systems to use in evaluating and improving the care they provide.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assessment; Mental health recovery; Reliability; Review; Service-user involvement; Validity

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24080285     DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev        ISSN: 0272-7358


  19 in total

Review 1.  The Relationship Between Clinical and Personal Recovery in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robin Michael Van Eck; Thijs Jan Burger; Astrid Vellinga; Frederike Schirmbeck; Lieuwe de Haan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Occupational Dysfunction as a Mediator between Recovery Process and Difficulties in Daily Life in Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: A Bayesian Structural Equation Modeling Approach.

Authors:  Aki Watanabe; Takayuki Kawaguchi; Mai Sakimoto; Yuya Oikawa; Keiichiro Furuya; Taichi Matsuoka
Journal:  Occup Ther Int       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 1.565

3.  Factors influencing the implementation of mental health recovery into services: a systematic mixed studies review.

Authors:  Myra Piat; Megan Wainwright; Eleni Sofouli; Brigitte Vachon; Tania Deslauriers; Cassandra Préfontaine; Francesca Frati
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-05

4.  Assessing the Recovery Assessment Scale Across Time.

Authors:  Sadaaki Fukui; Michelle P Salyers
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 4.157

5.  Service users' perspectives in the design of an online tool for assisted self-help in mental health: a case study of implications.

Authors:  Deede Gammon; Monica Strand; Lillian Sofie Eng
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2014-01-09

6.  Recovery Assessment Scale - Domains and Stages (RAS-DS): Its feasibility and outcome measurement capacity.

Authors:  Nicola Hancock; Justin Newton Scanlan; Anne Honey; Anita C Bundy; Katrina O'Shea
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 5.744

Review 7.  Transitions from biomedical to recovery-oriented practices in mental health: a scoping review to explore the role of Internet-based interventions.

Authors:  Monica Strand; Deede Gammon; Cornelia M Ruland
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 2.655

8.  Shifting Practices Toward Recovery-Oriented Care Through an E-Recovery Portal in Community Mental Health Care: A Mixed-Methods Exploratory Study.

Authors:  Deede Gammon; Monica Strand; Lillian Sofie Eng; Elin Børøsund; Cecilie Varsi; Cornelia Ruland
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  Validity of clinically significant change classifications yielded by Jacobson-Truax and Hageman-Arrindell methods.

Authors:  Fiona R Ronk; Geoffrey R Hooke; Andrew C Page
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.630

Review 10.  The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments.

Authors:  C B Terwee; C A C Prinsen; M G Ricci Garotti; A Suman; H C W de Vet; L B Mokkink
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.