| Literature DB >> 24078822 |
Subhash Dwivedi1, Rajasekar Nagarajan, Kashif Hanif, Hefazat Husain Siddiqui, Chandishwar Nath, Rakesh Shukla.
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of standardized extract of Bacopa monnieri (memory enhancer) and Melatonin (an antioxidant) on nuclear factor erythroid 2 related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway in Okadaic acid induced memory impaired rats. OKA (200 ng) was administered intracerebroventricularly (ICV) to induce memory impairment in rats. Bacopa monnieri (BM-40 and 80 mg/kg) and Melatonin (20 mg/kg) were administered 1 hr before OKA injection and continued daily up to day 13. Memory functions were assessed by Morris water maze test on days 13-15. Rats were sacrificed for biochemical estimations of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, apoptosis, and molecular studies of Nrf2, HO1, and GCLC expressions in cerebral cortex and hippocampus brain regions. OKA caused a significant memory deficit with oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neuronal loss which was concomitant with attenuated expression of Nrf2, HO1, and GCLC. Treatment with BM and Melatonin significantly improved memory dysfunction in OKA rats as shown by decreased latency time and path length. The treatments also restored Nrf2, HO1, and GCLC expressions and decreased oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and neuronal loss. Thus strengthening the endogenous defense through Nrf2 modulation plays a key role in the protective effect of BM and Melatonin in OKA induced memory impairment in rats.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24078822 PMCID: PMC3776558 DOI: 10.1155/2013/294501
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1| S. no. | Name | Primer sequence | Base pair | Temp (°C) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PP2A | Forward 5′-ATG GAC GAG AAG TTG TTC AC-3′ | 123 | 55 |
| Reverse 5′-GAC CAC CAT GTA GAC AGA AG-3′ | ||||
| 2 | TAU | Forward 5′-AAG ACA GAC CAT GGA GCA ATC-3′ | 132 | 60 |
| Reverse 5′-CGG CTA ACG TGG CAA GTC TAG-3′ | ||||
| 3 | GSK-3 | Forward 5′-AGC CTA TAT CCA TTC CTT GG-3′ | 123 | 60 |
| Reverse 5′-CCT CGG ACC AGC TGC TTT-3′ | ||||
| 4 | Bax | Forward 5′-GAC TAC GAG GCG TCA TCC-3′ | 357 | 55 |
| Reverse 5′-CCG ATG CTC TGC GCT CTG-3′ | ||||
| 5 | Bcl2 | Forward 5′-TGG CTT TCT CAT CTC CAT CC-3′ | 347 | 55 |
| Reverse 5′-CTC ACT GCC CCA TTA GTG C-3′ | ||||
| 6 |
| Forward 5′-GCC ATG TAC GTA GCC ATC CA-3′ | 352 | 55.7 |
| Reverse 5′-GAA CCG CTC ATT GCC GAT AG-3′ |
Figure 2
Figure 3| Group | Total | Ambulatory | Vertical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1650 ± 61.02 | 948.5 ± 101.3 | 1292 ± 289.8 |
| Vehicle | 1431 ± 88.67 | 756 ± 78.8 | 1763 ± 205.7 |
| OKA | 1694 ± 245.1 | 999.3 ± 205.5 | 1412 ± 242 |
| OKA + BM 40 | 1741 ± 197.5 | 678.5 ± 67.5 | 1330 ± 245 |
| OKA + BM 80 | 1556 ± 312.3 | 756 ± 78.8 | 1292 ± 289.8 |
| BM 80 | 1342 ± 231.1 | 867 ± 68.5 | 1323 ± 145.4 |
| OKA + Mel | 1503 ± 89.56 | 889.3 ± 214.8 | 1278 ± 267 |
| Mel | 1723 ± 74.34 | 879.4 ± 123.5 | 1324 ± 213.5 |
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10