Literature DB >> 2407872

An assessment of diltiazem and hydrochlorothiazide in hypertension. Application of factorial trial design to a multicenter clinical trial of combination therapy.

J F Burris1, M R Weir, S Oparil, M Weber, W J Cady, W H Stewart.   

Abstract

This multicenter, factorial-design trial assessed the safety and additive antihypertensive efficacy of a slow-release (SR) formulation of diltiazem hydrochloride given alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide for treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. After a 4- to 6-week placebo run-in period, 297 qualifying patients were randomized to receive placebo, 1 of 4 doses of diltiazem SR monotherapy, 1 of 3 doses of hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy, or 1 of 12 possible combinations of diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide for 6 weeks. A dose-related reduction in blood pressure was demonstrated for each drug as monotherapy and for the two drugs in combination. Absolute blood pressures of patients who received combination therapy were lower by an overall mean of 3.0 mm Hg diastolic and 8.0 mm Hg systolic vs diltiazem SR used alone and 3.5 mm Hg diastolic and 4.0 mm Hg systolic vs hydrochlorothiazide used alone. At the largest doses used, 50% of patients achieved goal blood pressure while taking hydrochlorothiazide, 57% while taking diltiazem SR, and 75% while taking combination therapy. Combination therapy was well tolerated. This trial clearly demonstrates that diltiazem SR and hydrochlorothiazide have additive antihypertensive effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2407872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  10 in total

Review 1.  Is fixed combination therapy appropriate for initial hypertension treatment?

Authors:  William J Elliott
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Selecting appropriate antihypertensive drug dosages.

Authors:  G D Johnston
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Personalizing the diuretic treatment of hypertension: the need for more clinical and research attention.

Authors:  Samuel J Mann; Michael E Ernst
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

4.  A comparison of the effects of low- and conventional-dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in hypertensive patients with NIDDM.

Authors:  R Harper; C N Ennis; A P Heaney; B Sheridan; M Gormley; A B Atkinson; G D Johnston; P M Bell
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  Use of diuretics in cardiovascular disease: (2) hypertension.

Authors:  S U Shah; S Anjum; W A Littler
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 6.  Goals of antihypertensive therapy.

Authors:  G E McVeigh; J Flack; R Grimm
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.546

7.  Effects of low dose versus conventional dose thiazide diuretic on insulin action in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R Harper; C N Ennis; B Sheridan; A B Atkinson; G D Johnston; P M Bell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-23

Review 8.  Epidemiology of stroke. Importance of preventive pharmacological strategies in elderly patients and associated costs.

Authors:  I Kawachi
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  24-Hour ambulatory blood pressure response to combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 hypertension by ethnicity: the EVALUATE study.

Authors:  Jackson T Wright; Yves Lacourcière; Rita Samuel; Dion Zappe; Das Purkayastha; Henry R Black
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.738

10.  Current concepts of pharmacotherapy in hypertension: thiazide-type diuretics: ongoing considerations on mechanism of action.

Authors:  Domenic A Sica
Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.738

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.