Literature DB >> 24078619

Individual physical characteristics of neonatal piglets affect preweaning survival of piglets born in a noncrated system.

J Hales1, V A Moustsen, M B F Nielsen, C F Hansen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of individual physical characteristics on preweaning survival and growth of piglets born in a noncrate system. Data were collected from 3,402 neonatal piglets from 203 Landrace × Yorkshire sows housed in noncrate pens in a commercial Danish sow herd. Piglets were categorized into groups according to their survivability: surviving to weaning (SURV), stillborn (STILL), or dead between birth and weaning (DBW), which was subdivided into dead d 0 to 1 after farrowing (DEAD1) or dead d 2 to 26 after farrowing (DEAD26). Linear models were used to determine which physical characteristics affected survivability and growth of piglets. Results showed that characteristics related to the individual piglets had a greater degree of explanatory power in relation to survival than variables related to the sow. Survival of piglets increased if piglets were females (P < 0.001), had a greater body mass index (P < 0.001), and were born to sows of parity 3 or more (P = 0.017). Piglets with a greater birth weight were more likely to survive (P < 0.001), but birth weight was inferior to body mass index in explaining differences between SURV and DBW. Piglets that died 2 to 26 d after birth had a lower birth weight (P < 0.001), were born to sows of parity 1 or 2 (P = 0.014), and were born after a shorter gestation (P = 0.011) compared with SURV. Piglets that died on d 0 to 1 after birth had a lower body mass index (P < 0.001), displayed a greater degree of growth restriction (P = 0.004), and were born in large litters (P = 0.005). The gender of the piglets affected survivability at both d 0 to 1 (P < 0.001) and d 2 to 26 (P < 0.001). Piglets in DEAD1 differed from STILL by having a shorter crown to rump length (P < 0.001), a birth weight that deviated more from the mean weight of the litter (P = 0.001), and being more likely to be born before d 116 of gestation (P = 0.008). The only physical characteristic that was important for growth performance in the suckling period was birth weight (P < 0.001), yet using only birth weight as an indicator for survivability was too simplistic. The results of this study emphasize that individual characteristics of neonatal piglets could serve as indicators of survivability of piglets born in noncrate systems; however, the results suggest that the importance of characteristics differed in different periods of the preweaning period.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078619     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2012-5740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  27 in total

1.  Effect of increasing dietary energy density during late gestation and lactation on sow performance, piglet vitality, and lifetime growth of offspring.

Authors:  Hazel B Rooney; Keelin O'driscoll; John V O'doherty; Peadar G Lawlor
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  What is good for small piglets might not be good for big piglets: The consequences of cross-fostering and creep feed provision on performance to slaughter.

Authors:  A M S Huting; K Almond; I Wellock; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Welfare of pigs on farm.

Authors:  Søren Saxmose Nielsen; Julio Alvarez; Dominique Joseph Bicout; Paolo Calistri; Elisabetta Canali; Julian Ashley Drewe; Bruno Garin-Bastuji; Jose Luis Gonzales Rojas; Gortázar Schmidt; Mette Herskin; Virginie Michel; Miguel Ángel Miranda Chueca; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Barbara Padalino; Helen Clare Roberts; Karl Stahl; Antonio Velarde; Arvo Viltrop; Christoph Winckler; Sandra Edwards; Sonya Ivanova; Christine Leeb; Beat Wechsler; Chiara Fabris; Eliana Lima; Olaf Mosbach-Schulz; Yves Van der Stede; Marika Vitali; Hans Spoolder
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2022-08-25

4.  Association between Head-to-Chest Circumference Ratio and Intrauterine Growth-Retardation Related Outcomes during Preweaning and Postweaning.

Authors:  Diego Manriquez; Guilhem Poudevigne; Etienne Roche; Agnes Waret-Szkuta
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Effects of intrauterine growth retardation and Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation on growth performance, intestinal development and immune function of piglets during the suckling period.

Authors:  Liang Hu; Xie Peng; Hong Chen; Chuan Yan; Yan Liu; Qin Xu; Zhengfeng Fang; Yan Lin; Shengyu Xu; Bin Feng; Jian Li; Lianqiang Che
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 5.614

6.  Structure and Function of Enterocyte in Intrauterine Growth Retarded Pig Neonates.

Authors:  Karolina Ferenc; Tomasz Pilżys; Tomasz Skrzypek; Damian Garbicz; Michał Marcinkowski; Małgorzata Dylewska; Paweł Gładysz; Oleksandr Skorobogatov; Zdzisław Gajewski; Elżbieta Grzesiuk; Romuald Zabielski
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  Inflammatory markers before and after farrowing in healthy sows and in sows affected with postpartum dysgalactia syndrome.

Authors:  Marianne Kaiser; Magdalena Jacobson; Pia Haubro Andersen; Poul Bækbo; José Joaquin Cerón; Jan Dahl; Damián Escribano; Stine Jacobsen
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Once small always small? To what extent morphometric characteristics and post-weaning starter regime affect pig lifetime growth performance.

Authors:  A M S Huting; P Sakkas; I Wellock; K Almond; I Kyriazakis
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2018-07-23

9.  Changes in Faecal Microbiota Profiles Associated With Performance and Birthweight of Piglets.

Authors:  Clare H Gaukroger; Christopher J Stewart; Sandra A Edwards; John Walshaw; Ian P Adams; Ilias Kyriazakis
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Genetic selection against intrauterine growth retardation in piglets: a problem at the piglet level with a solution at the sow level.

Authors:  Stephanie M Matheson; Grant A Walling; Sandra A Edwards
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.