Literature DB >> 24078539

The imaging and classification of severe pelvic ring fractures: Experiences from two level 1 trauma centres.

B J Gabbe1, M Esser, A Bucknill, M K Russ, D-J Hofstee, P A Cameron, C Handley, R N de Steiger.   

Abstract

We describe the routine imaging practices of Level 1 trauma centres for patients with severe pelvic ring fractures, and the interobserver reliability of the classification systems of these fractures using plain radiographs and three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstructions. Clinical and imaging data for 187 adult patients (139 men and 48 women, mean age 43 years (15 to 101)) with a severe pelvic ring fracture managed at two Level 1 trauma centres between July 2007 and June 2010 were extracted. Three experienced orthopaedic surgeons classified the plain radiographs and 3D CT reconstruction images of 100 patients using the Tile/AO and Young-Burgess systems. Reliability was compared using kappa statistics. A total of 115 patients (62%) had plain radiographs as well as two-dimensional (2D) CT and 3D CT reconstructions, 52 patients (28%) had plain films only, 12 (6.4%) had 2D and 3D CT reconstructions images only, and eight patients (4.3%) had no available images. The plain radiograph was limited to an anteroposterior pelvic view. Patients without imaging, or only plain films, were more severely injured. A total of 72 patients (39%) were imaged with a pelvic binder in situ. Interobserver reliability for the Tile/AO (Kappa 0.10 to 0.17) and Young-Burgess (Kappa 0.09 to 0.21) was low, and insufficient for clinical and research purposes. Severe pelvic ring fractures are difficult to classify due to their complexity, the increasing use of early treatment such as with pelvic binders, and the absence of imaging altogether in important patient sub-groups, such as those who die early of their injuries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Imaging; Pelvic fracture; Trauma

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078539     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.95B10.32134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Joint J        ISSN: 2049-4394            Impact factor:   5.082


  11 in total

Review 1.  Classifications in brief: young and burgess classification of pelvic ring injuries.

Authors:  Timothy B Alton; Albert O Gee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Ultra-low-dose CT versus radiographs for minor spine and pelvis trauma: a Bayesian analysis of accuracy.

Authors:  Aymeric Hamard; Joel Greffier; Sophie Bastide; Ahmed Larbi; Takieddine Addala; Alexandre Sadate; Jean-Paul Beregi; Julien Frandon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions Do Not Improve the Interobserver Reliability of the AO/Orthopaedic Trauma Association and Young and Burgess Pelvic Fracture Classifications.

Authors:  Seong-Eun Byun; Jihyo Hwang; Motasem Salameh; Nicholas J Tucker; Michael Hadeed; Austin Heare; Stephen C Stacey; Cyril Mauffrey; Joshua A Parry
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 1.033

4.  Pelvic fracture instability-associated L5 transverse process fracture, fact or myth? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hazem Nasef; Ahmed Elhessy; Faris Abushaban; Abduljabbar Alhammoud
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-12-07

5.  Criteria for level 1 and level 2 trauma codes: Are pelvic ring injuries undertriaged?

Authors:  Brittany E Haws; Scott Wuertzer; Laura Raffield; Leon Lenchik; Anna N Miller
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2016-08-18

6.  Association of pelvic fracture patterns, pelvic binder use and arterial angio-embolization with transfusion requirements and mortality rates; a 7-year retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Fabio Agri; Mylène Bourgeat; Fabio Becce; Kevin Moerenhout; Mathieu Pasquier; Olivier Borens; Bertrand Yersin; Nicolas Demartines; Tobias Zingg
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Radiological measurement of pelvic fractures using a pelvic deformity measurement software program.

Authors:  Shuwei Zhang; Gongzi Zhang; Ye Peng; Xiang Wang; Peifu Tang; Lihai Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Interobserver reliability of the Tile classification system for pelvic fractures among radiologists and surgeons.

Authors:  Tobias Zingg; Emilie Uldry; Patrick Omoumi; Daniel Clerc; Arnaud Monier; Basile Pache; Mohammed Moshebah; Fabio Butti; Fabio Becce
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  An Automated Deep Learning Method for Tile AO/OTA Pelvic Fracture Severity Grading from Trauma whole-Body CT.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Florian Goldmann; Christina LeBedis; Alexis Boscak; Matthew Dattwyler; Uttam Bodanapally; Guang Li; Stephan Anderson; Andreas Maier; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  A prospective case series for a minimally invasive internal fixation device for anterior pelvic ring fractures.

Authors:  Wayne Hoskins; Andrew Bucknill; James Wong; Edward Britton; Rodney Judson; Kellie Gumm; Roselyn Santos; Rohan Sheehy; Xavier Griffin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.