Literature DB >> 24076686

Autologous immediate cranioplasty with vascularized bone in high-risk composite cranial defects.

Justine C Lee1, Grant M Kleiber, Aaron T Pelletier, Russell R Reid, Lawrence J Gottlieb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Composite cranial defects in the setting of infection, irradiation, or cerebrospinal fluid leak present a significant risk for devastating neurologic sequelae. Such defects require soft-tissue coverage and skeletal reconstruction that can withstand the hostile environment of a precarious wound.
METHODS: Patients with high-risk composite cranial defects treated with free flap reconstruction containing a vascularized osseous component from 2003 to 2012 were reviewed retrospectively.
RESULTS: Fourteen patients received autologous vascularized cranioplasties between 2003 and 2012 with a mean age of 55.7 years and a mean follow-up of 14.1 months. Preoperatively, all patients had infection, irradiation, cerebrospinal fluid leak, or a combination thereof. Thirteen patients (92.9 percent) were reoperative cases for recurrent tumor, infection, or both. Six patients (42.9 percent) failed previous reconstructive procedures. Tissue biopsy-proven infection was present in 10 patients (71.4 percent) with calvarial osteomyelitis, both osteomyelitis and meningitis, or scalp soft-tissue infection only. Nine patients (64.3 percent) suffered from malignancy and six of these patients were irradiated preoperatively. Cranioplasty was achieved as part of a chimeric free flap using rib, scapula, both rib and scapula, or ilium. Vascularized duraplasty using serratus anterior fascia as a component of the chimeric flap was performed in three patients. No flap losses occurred and all patients had resolution of infection.
CONCLUSIONS: Soft-tissue and skeletal restoration are the two critical components of composite cranial reconstruction. The authors report outcomes of the largest series of one-stage immediate cranioplasty consisting of autologous soft tissue and vascularized bone in high-risk composite cranial wounds and suggest its application in defects associated with compromised wound beds. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076686     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31829f4b59

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  20 in total

1.  Biomimetic Scaffolds for Osteogenesis.

Authors:  Nance Yuan; Kameron S Rezzadeh; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Receptors Clin Investig       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  Cranioplasty for large-sized calvarial defects in the pediatric population: a review.

Authors:  Sandi Lam; Justin Kuether; Abigail Fong; Russell Reid
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 3.  Bioinspired Collagen Scaffolds in Cranial Bone Regeneration: From Bedside to Bench.

Authors:  Justine C Lee; Elizabeth J Volpicelli
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 9.933

4.  Osteogenesis on nanoparticulate mineralized collagen scaffolds via autogenous activation of the canonical BMP receptor signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ren; David Bischoff; Daniel W Weisgerber; Michael S Lewis; Victor Tu; Dean T Yamaguchi; Timothy A Miller; Brendan A C Harley; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 5.  Can anatomical feasibility studies drive neurosurgical procedures and reach patients faster than traditional translational research?

Authors:  Joe Iwanaga; Nicole A Boggio; C J Bui; Aaron S Dumont; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.800

6.  Outcomes of Cranioplasty Strategies for High-Risk Complex Cranial Defects: A 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Edgar Soto; Ryan D Restrepo; John H Grant; René P Myers
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 1.763

7.  Nanoparticulate mineralized collagen scaffolds induce in vivo bone regeneration independent of progenitor cell loading or exogenous growth factor stimulation.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Ren; Victor Tu; David Bischoff; Daniel W Weisgerber; Michael S Lewis; Dean T Yamaguchi; Timothy A Miller; Brendan A C Harley; Justine C Lee
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Scalp Reconstruction after Malignant Tumor Resection: An Analysis and Algorithm.

Authors:  Denis Ehrl; Alexandra Brueggemann; P Niclas Broer; Konstantin Koban; Riccardo Giunta; Niklas Thon
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2019-03-01

9.  Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.

Authors:  Demetri Arnaoutakis; Arash Bahrami; Jason E Cohn; Jesse E Smith
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

10.  Inclusion of a 3D-printed Hyperelastic Bone mesh improves mechanical and osteogenic performance of a mineralized collagen scaffold.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Andrey V Nosatov; Kiran Subedi; Ramille Shah; Adam Jakus; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.