Literature DB >> 24076536

Eye-tracking the own-race bias in face recognition: revealing the perceptual and socio-cognitive mechanisms.

Peter J Hills1, J Michael Pake.   

Abstract

Own-race faces are recognised more accurately than other-race faces and may even be viewed differently as measured by an eye-tracker (Goldinger, Papesh, & He, 2009). Alternatively, observer race might direct eye-movements (Blais, Jack, Scheepers, Fiset, & Caldara, 2008). Observer differences in eye-movements are likely to be based on experience of the physiognomic characteristics that are differentially discriminating for Black and White faces. Two experiments are reported that employed standard old/new recognition paradigms in which Black and White observers viewed Black and White faces with their eye-movements recorded. Experiment 1 showed that there were observer race differences in terms of the features scanned but observers employed the same strategy across different types of faces. Experiment 2 demonstrated that other-race faces could be recognised more accurately if participants had their first fixation directed to more diagnostic features using fixation crosses. These results are entirely consistent with those presented by Blais et al. (2008) and with the perceptual interpretation that the own-race bias is due to inappropriate attention allocated to the facial features (Hills & Lewis, 2006, 2011).
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attentional cueing; Cross-race effect; Eye-movements; Face recognition; The own-race bias

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24076536     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  15 in total

1.  Psychopathic traits are associated with reduced fixations to the eye region of fearful faces.

Authors:  Monika Dargis; Richard C Wolf; Michael Koenigs
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2018-01

2.  Where You Look Matters for Body Perception: Preferred Gaze Location Contributes to the Body Inversion Effect.

Authors:  Joseph M Arizpe; Danielle L McKean; Jack W Tsao; Annie W-Y Chan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Explaining Sad People's Memory Advantage for Faces.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Zoe Marquardt; Isabel Young; Imogen Goodenough
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-17

4.  Even subtle cultural differences affect face tuning.

Authors:  Marina A Pavlova; Julie Heiz; Alexander N Sokolov; Andreas J Fallgatter; Koviljka Barisnikov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The Role of Extraversion, IQ and Contact in the Own-Ethnicity Face Recognition Bias.

Authors:  Peter J Hills; Leanne Lowe; Brooke Hedges; Ana Rita Teixeira
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Postdictive confidence (but not predictive confidence) predicts eyewitness memory accuracy.

Authors:  Thao B Nguyen; Erica Abed; Kathy Pezdek
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-29

7.  Differences in Looking at Own- and Other-Race Faces Are Subtle and Analysis-Dependent: An Account of Discrepant Reports.

Authors:  Joseph Arizpe; Dwight J Kravitz; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Chris I Baker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Visual scanning behavior is related to recognition performance for own- and other-age faces.

Authors:  Valentina Proietti; Viola Macchi Cassia; Francesca dell'Amore; Stefania Conte; Emanuela Bricolo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-03

9.  Feature instructions improve face-matching accuracy.

Authors:  Ahmed M Megreya; Markus Bindemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The "face race lightness illusion": An effect of the eyes and pupils?

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Kenneth Gitiye Kiambarua; Thomas Hagen; Agata Bochynska; Jamie Lubell; Hikaru Suzuki; Matia Okubo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.