Literature DB >> 24075332

Forced-air warming devices and the risk of surgical site infections.

Melissa D Kellam, Loraine S Dieckmann, Paul N Austin.   

Abstract

The potential that forced-air warming systems may increase the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) by acting as a vector or causing unwanted airflow disturbances is a concern to health care providers. To investigate this potential, we examined the literature to determine whether forced-air warming devices increase the risk of SSIs in patients undergoing general, vascular, or orthopedic surgical procedures. We examined 192 evidence sources, 15 of which met our inclusion criteria. Most sources we found indirectly addressed the issue of forced-air warming and only three studies followed patients who were warmed intraoperatively with forced-air warming devices to determine whether there was an increased incidence of SSIs. All of the sources we examined contained methodological concerns, and the evidence did not conclusively suggest that the use of forced-air warming systems increases the risk of SSIs. Given the efficacy of these devices in preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia, practitioners should continue to use and clean forced-air warming systems according to the manufacturer's instructions until well-conducted, large-scale trials can further examine the issue.
Copyright © 2013 AORN, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  forced-air warming; intraoperative hypothermia; normothermia; surgical site infection

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24075332     DOI: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AORN J        ISSN: 0001-2092            Impact factor:   0.676


  7 in total

1.  Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia.

Authors:  Alexander Torossian; Anselm Bräuer; Jan Höcker; Berthold Bein; Hinnerk Wulf; Ernst-Peter Horn
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Prevention of fracture-related infection: a multidisciplinary care package.

Authors:  Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Jolien Onsea; Emilie Neutjens; Ester Steffens; Annette Schuermans; Martin McNally; Stefaan Nijs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Safety and efficacy of resistive polymer versus forced air warming in total joint surgery.

Authors:  Melanie F Sandoval; Paul D Mongan; Michael R Dayton; Craig A Hogan
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-04-14

4.  Forced-Air Warming and Resistive Heating Devices. Updated Perspectives on Safety and Surgical Site Infections.

Authors:  Wiebke Ackermann; Qianqian Fan; Akarsh J Parekh; Nicoleta Stoicea; John Ryan; Sergio D Bergese
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Forced-Air Convection Versus Underbody Conduction Warming Strategies to Maintain Perioperative Normothermia in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert McClain; Elird Bojaxhi; Samantha Ford; Karina Hex; Joseph Whalen; Christopher Robards
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-11-13

6.  Inadvertent hypothermia in hip and knee total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Williams; Y El-Houdiri
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-01-20

7.  Reducing Implant Infection in Orthopaedics (RIIiO): a pilot study for a randomised controlled trial comparing the influence of forced air versus resistive fabric warming technologies on postoperative infection rates following orthopaedic implant surgery in adults.

Authors:  Michelle Kümin; Christopher Mark Harper; Mike Reed; Stephen Bremner; Nicky Perry; Matthew Scarborough
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.