Elisabeth H Frieling-Reuss1. 1. From Zentrum für Premium-Linsen-Implantate, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: elisabeth.frieling@online.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the postoperative visual and refractive outcomes and patients' visual satisfaction after implantation of an aspheric or an aspheric toric multifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with equivalent biometric characteristics. SETTING: Private clinic, Munich, Germany. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS: Patients having cataract surgery were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: aspheric, which had AT Lisa 809M IOL implantation, and aspheric toric, which had AT Lisa 909M IOL implantation (corneal toricity ≥0.75 diopter [D]). Visual and refractive postoperative outcomes were evaluated, as was the patient's ability to perform daily tasks related to vision and the incidence of photic phenomena. RESULTS: The aspheric group comprised 77 eyes (42 patients) and the aspheric toric group, 26 eyes (17 patients). A significant improvement in corrected distance and near visual acuity was observed postoperatively in both groups, as was a significant reduction in the astigmatic component J0 (P<.01). The aspheric toric group had significantly better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (P=.01). In both groups, the postoperative astigmatic power vectors and spherical equivalent were within ±0.50 D in 100% of eyes and in more than 88% of eyes, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in any subjective patient questionnaire item. There was no difference in the incidence of photic phenomena between the groups (P≥0.16). CONCLUSION: The addition of a toric surface to the aspheric diffractive multifocal platform resulted in a comparable visual performance and ability to perform visual tasks. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
PURPOSE: To analyze and compare the postoperative visual and refractive outcomes and patients' visual satisfaction after implantation of an aspheric or an aspheric toric multifocal diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) in eyes with equivalent biometric characteristics. SETTING: Private clinic, Munich, Germany. DESIGN: Comparative case series. METHODS:Patients having cataract surgery were assigned to 1 of 2 groups: aspheric, which had AT Lisa 809M IOL implantation, and aspheric toric, which had AT Lisa 909M IOL implantation (corneal toricity ≥0.75 diopter [D]). Visual and refractive postoperative outcomes were evaluated, as was the patient's ability to perform daily tasks related to vision and the incidence of photic phenomena. RESULTS: The aspheric group comprised 77 eyes (42 patients) and the aspheric toric group, 26 eyes (17 patients). A significant improvement in corrected distance and near visual acuity was observed postoperatively in both groups, as was a significant reduction in the astigmatic component J0 (P<.01). The aspheric toric group had significantly better uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (P=.01). In both groups, the postoperative astigmatic power vectors and spherical equivalent were within ±0.50 D in 100% of eyes and in more than 88% of eyes, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in any subjective patient questionnaire item. There was no difference in the incidence of photic phenomena between the groups (P≥0.16). CONCLUSION: The addition of a toric surface to the aspheric diffractive multifocal platform resulted in a comparable visual performance and ability to perform visual tasks. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Authors: André Lins de Medeiros; Flavio Jones Saraiva; Camila Ishii Iguma; Danilo Varela Kniggendorf; Guilherme Alves; Mario Augusto Pereira Dias Chaves; Cesar Vilar; Antonio Francisco Pimenta Motta; Pedro Carlos Carricondo; Celso Takashi Nakano; Walton Nosé; Wilson Takashi Hida Journal: Clin Ophthalmol Date: 2019-08-29