PURPOSE: Radiation therapy remains an essential treatment for patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PMRMS), and early radiation therapy may improve local control for patients with intracranial extension (ICE). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To address the role of radiation therapy timing in PMRMS in the current era, we reviewed the outcome from 2 recent clinical trials for intermediate-risk RMS: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV and Children's Oncology Group (COG) D9803. The PMRMS patients on IRS-IV with any high-risk features (cranial nerve palsy [CNP], cranial base bony erosion [CBBE], or ICE) were treated immediately at day 0, and PMRMS patients without any of these 3 features received week 6-9 radiation therapy. The D9803 PMRMS patients with ICE received day 0 X-Ray Therapy (XRT) as well; however, those with either CNP or CBBE had XRT at week 12. RESULTS: Compared with the 198 PMRMS patients from IRS-IV, the 192 PMRMS patients from D9803 had no difference (P<.05) in 5-year local failure (19% vs 19%), failure-free-survival (70% vs 67%), or overall survival (75% vs 73%) in aggregate. The 5-year local failure rates by subset did not differ when patients were classified as having no risk features (None, 15% vs 19%, P=.25), cranial nerve palsy/cranial base of skull erosion (CNP/CBBE, 15% vs 28%, P=.22), or intracranial extension (ICE, 21% vs 15%, P=.27). The D9083 patients were more likely to have received initial staging by magnetic resonance imaging (71% vs 53%). CONCLUSIONS: These data support that a delay in radiation therapy for high-risk PMRMS features of CNP/CBBE does not compromise clinical outcomes.
PURPOSE:Radiation therapy remains an essential treatment for patients with parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PMRMS), and early radiation therapy may improve local control for patients with intracranial extension (ICE). METHODS AND MATERIALS: To address the role of radiation therapy timing in PMRMS in the current era, we reviewed the outcome from 2 recent clinical trials for intermediate-risk RMS: Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (IRS)-IV and Children's Oncology Group (COG) D9803. The PMRMS patients on IRS-IV with any high-risk features (cranial nerve palsy [CNP], cranial base bony erosion [CBBE], or ICE) were treated immediately at day 0, and PMRMS patients without any of these 3 features received week 6-9 radiation therapy. The D9803 PMRMS patients with ICE received day 0 X-Ray Therapy (XRT) as well; however, those with either CNP or CBBE had XRT at week 12. RESULTS: Compared with the 198 PMRMS patients from IRS-IV, the 192 PMRMS patients from D9803 had no difference (P<.05) in 5-year local failure (19% vs 19%), failure-free-survival (70% vs 67%), or overall survival (75% vs 73%) in aggregate. The 5-year local failure rates by subset did not differ when patients were classified as having no risk features (None, 15% vs 19%, P=.25), cranial nerve palsy/cranial base of skull erosion (CNP/CBBE, 15% vs 28%, P=.22), or intracranial extension (ICE, 21% vs 15%, P=.27). The D9083 patients were more likely to have received initial staging by magnetic resonance imaging (71% vs 53%). CONCLUSIONS: These data support that a delay in radiation therapy for high-risk PMRMS features of CNP/CBBE does not compromise clinical outcomes.
Authors: W M Crist; J R Anderson; J L Meza; C Fryer; R B Raney; F B Ruymann; J Breneman; S J Qualman; E Wiener; M Wharam; T Lobe; B Webber; H M Maurer; S S Donaldson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2001-06-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: S S Donaldson; J Meza; J C Breneman; W M Crist; F Laurie; S J Qualman; M Wharam Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: A Yuriko Minn; Elizabeth R Lyden; James R Anderson; Lynn Million; Carola A Arndt; Kenneth Brown; Douglas S Hawkins; Sarah S Donaldson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-08-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Carola A S Arndt; Julie A Stoner; Douglas S Hawkins; David A Rodeberg; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; Charles N Paidas; David M Parham; Lisa A Teot; Moody D Wharam; John C Breneman; Sarah S Donaldson; James R Anderson; William H Meyer Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jeff M Michalski; Jane Meza; John C Breneman; Suzanne L Wolden; Fran Laurie; MaryAnn Jodoin; Beverly Raney; Moody D Wharam; Sarah S Donaldson Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1977-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Brian De; Michael D Kinnaman; Leonard H Wexler; Kim Kramer; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-07-11 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Matthew M Ladra; Jackie D Szymonifka; Anita Mahajan; Alison M Friedmann; Beow Yong Yeap; Claire P Goebel; Shannon M MacDonald; David R Grosshans; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Karen J Marcus; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-10-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Matthew M Ladra; Henry C Mandeville; Andrzej Niemierko; Timothy P Padera; Alison M Friedmann; Shannon M MacDonald; David Ebb; Yen-Lin Chen; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn I Yock Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-04-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel C Moreira; Margaret E Macy; Carrye R Cost; Brian S Greffe; Timothy P Garrington Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: Jamie M Aye; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jing Tian; Erin R Rudzinski; Odion T Binitie; Roshni Dasgupta; Suzanne L Wolden; Douglas S Hawkins; Abha A Gupta Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2020-03-02 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Ralph P Ermoian; John Breneman; David O Walterhouse; Yueh-Yun Chi; Jane Meza; James Anderson; Douglas S Hawkins; Andrea A Hayes-Jordan; David M Parham; Torunn I Yock; Sarah S Donaldson; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2017-05-26 Impact factor: 3.167