PURPOSE: The optimal management of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is unclear. We examined diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with RMS developing CNS relapse. METHODS: Records of 23 patients diagnosed with CNS relapse between 1999 and 2016 were reviewed. Median age at presentation of CNS relapse was 15 years (range, 1-34 years). High-risk features at initial presentation were as follows: 16 alveolar patients, 13 Stage IV, and 13 with primary tumor in parameningeal locations. RESULTS: CNS relapse occurred at a median 12 months (range, 1-23 months) from diagnosis and most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 9), nausea/vomiting (n = 8), visual difficulty (n = 5), and none (n = 5). Leptomeningeal metastases were detected in 21 patients while only 2 developed parenchymal metastases without leptomeningeal involvement. Fifteen patients received CNS-directed radiation therapy (RT), including craniospinal irradiation to a median 36 Gy (range, 18-36 Gy) and/or whole brain radiotherapy to a median 30 Gy (range, 6-41.4 Gy). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 13 patients after RT initiation with 8 demonstrating improvement, 2 with stable disease, and 3 with progression. Twelve patients were tested for reactivity to I-131-labeled monoclonal antibody 8H9, and three tested positive and received at least one intra-Ommaya dose; all three lived >12 months post-CNS relapse. Twenty‐two patients died of CNS disease and one of treatment complications, with metastatic disease at other sites. Median survival post-CNS relapse was 5 months (range, 0.1-49 months). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for patients with RMS developing CNS relapse remains poor. Treatment including CNS-directed RT should be considered and investigation into preventative therapies is warranted.
PURPOSE: The optimal management of central nervous system (CNS) relapse of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is unclear. We examined diagnosis, management, and outcomes of patients with RMS developing CNS relapse. METHODS: Records of 23 patients diagnosed with CNS relapse between 1999 and 2016 were reviewed. Median age at presentation of CNS relapse was 15 years (range, 1-34 years). High-risk features at initial presentation were as follows: 16 alveolarpatients, 13 Stage IV, and 13 with primary tumor in parameningeal locations. RESULTS: CNS relapse occurred at a median 12 months (range, 1-23 months) from diagnosis and most common presenting symptoms were headache (n = 9), nausea/vomiting (n = 8), visual difficulty (n = 5), and none (n = 5). Leptomeningeal metastases were detected in 21 patients while only 2 developed parenchymal metastases without leptomeningeal involvement. Fifteen patients received CNS-directed radiation therapy (RT), including craniospinal irradiation to a median 36 Gy (range, 18-36 Gy) and/or whole brain radiotherapy to a median 30 Gy (range, 6-41.4 Gy). Three patients received concurrent chemotherapy. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was conducted in 13 patients after RT initiation with 8 demonstrating improvement, 2 with stable disease, and 3 with progression. Twelve patients were tested for reactivity to I-131-labeled monoclonal antibody 8H9, and three tested positive and received at least one intra-Ommaya dose; all three lived >12 months post-CNS relapse. Twenty‐two patientsdied of CNS disease and one of treatment complications, with metastatic disease at other sites. Median survival post-CNS relapse was 5 months (range, 0.1-49 months). CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis for patients with RMS developing CNS relapse remains poor. Treatment including CNS-directed RT should be considered and investigation into preventative therapies is warranted.
Authors: Rudy Komdeur; Jenneke Klunder; Winette T A van der Graaf; Eva van den Berg; Eveline S J M de Bont; Harald J Hoekstra; Willemina M Molenaar Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-04-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Iyad Sultan; Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Sameer Yaser; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Andrea Ferrari Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-04-27 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Torunn I Yock; Beow Y Yeap; David H Ebb; Elizabeth Weyman; Bree R Eaton; Nicole A Sherry; Robin M Jones; Shannon M MacDonald; Margaret B Pulsifer; Beverly Lavally; Annah N Abrams; Mary S Huang; Karen J Marcus; Nancy J Tarbell Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Felice D'Arco; Livja Mertiri; Pim de Graaf; Bert De Foer; Katarina S Popovič; Maria I Argyropoulou; Kshitij Mankad; Hervé J Brisse; Amy Juliano; Mariasavina Severino; Sofie Van Cauter; Mai-Lan Ho; Caroline D Robson; Ata Siddiqui; Steve Connor; Sotirios Bisdas Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2022-04-23 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Michel Gustavo Mondragón-Soto; Luis Del Valle; José Alfredo González-Soto; Roberto Alfonso De Leo-Vargas Journal: J Neurosurg Case Lessons Date: 2022-07-25