Literature DB >> 24074787

p53 in breast cancer subtypes and new insights into response to chemotherapy.

Philippe Bertheau1, Jacqueline Lehmann-Che, Mariana Varna, Anne Dumay, Brigitte Poirot, Raphaël Porcher, Elisabeth Turpin, Louis-François Plassa, Anne de Roquancourt, Edwige Bourstyn, Patricia de Cremoux, Anne Janin, Sylvie Giacchetti, Marc Espié, Hugues de Thé.   

Abstract

Despite an obvious central role of p53 in the hallmarks of cancer, TP53 status is not yet used for the management of breast cancer. Recent findings may lead to reconsider the role of p53 in breast cancer. TP53 mutations are the most frequent genetic alterations in breast cancer, observed in 30% of breast carcinomas. Their distribution is highly linked to molecular tumor subtypes found in 26% of luminal tumors (17% of luminal A, 41% of luminal B), in 50% of HER2 amplified tumors, in 69% of molecular apocrine breast carcinomas and in 88% of basal-like carcinomas. The type of mutation is linked to the tumor subtype with higher frequency of base-pair substitutions in luminal tumors, whereas molecular apocrine and basal-like tumors present much higher frequency of complex mutations (deletions/insertions). The timing of TP53 mutation also depends on the tumor subtype, being the first important event in luminal tumors but occurring after PTEN loss in basal-like tumors. Regarding response to cytotoxic chemotherapy, the situation is far from the p53-dependent apoptosis paradigm with subsequent clinical response. We reported that TP53 mutated non inflammatory locally advanced breast carcinomas had a high rate of complete pathological response to dose-dense doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, while TP53 wild-type (WT) tumors never achieved complete response. Using human breast cancer xenograft models, we suggested that this could be due to the induction of senescence in TP53 WT tumor cells. A recent work confirmed these findings in MMTV-Wnt1 mammary tumors, showing that growth arrest and senescent phenotype, not apoptosis, were induced in TP53 WT tumors following doxorubicin treatment, while lack of arrest in mutant tumors resulted in aberrant mitoses, cell death and a superior clinical response. Furthermore, in ER positive (ER(+)) breast tumors, it has been recently reported that ER represses the p53-mediated apoptotic response induced by DNA damage. Taken together, these data can help to better understand p53-mediated response to doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer: in ER(+) TP53 WT breast cancers, ER-induced inhibition of p53 apoptotic response would lead preferentially to tumor cell senescence and subsequent resistance to treatment. Conversely, in ER negative (ER(-)) TP53 mutated breast cancers, accumulation of genetic abnormalities would lead to mitotic catastrophe and subsequent better response. In view of these recent results, p53 impact in breast cancer should be reconsidered.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast carcinoma; Molecular subtypes; Response to chemotherapy; p53; protein encoded by the TP53 gene

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24074787     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  74 in total

Review 1.  RUNX1-dependent mechanisms in biological control and dysregulation in cancer.

Authors:  Deli Hong; Andrew J Fritz; Jonathan A Gordon; Coralee E Tye; Joseph R Boyd; Kirsten M Tracy; Seth E Frietze; Frances E Carr; Jeffrey A Nickerson; Andre J Van Wijnen; Anthony N Imbalzano; Sayyed K Zaidi; Jane B Lian; Janet L Stein; Gary S Stein
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 6.384

2.  p53 Promotes cell survival due to the reversibility of its cell-cycle checkpoints.

Authors:  Dana J Lukin; Luis A Carvajal; Wen-jun Liu; Lois Resnick-Silverman; James J Manfredi
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 5.852

3.  p53 Modulates Notch Signaling in MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells by Associating With the Notch Transcriptional Complex Via MAML1.

Authors:  Jieun Yun; Ingrid Espinoza; Antonio Pannuti; Damian Romero; Luis Martinez; Mary Caskey; Adina Stanculescu; Maurizio Bocchetta; Paola Rizzo; Vimla Band; Hamid Band; Hwan Mook Kim; Song-Kyu Park; Keon Wook Kang; Maria Laura Avantaggiati; Christian R Gomez; Todd Golde; Barbara Osborne; Lucio Miele
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.384

4.  Learning Moral Graphs in Construction of High-Dimensional Bayesian Networks for Mixed Data.

Authors:  Suwa Xu; Bochao Jia; Faming Liang
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Novel role of PELP1 in regulating chemotherapy response in mutant p53-expressing triple negative breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Samaya R Krishnan; Binoj C Nair; Gangadhara R Sareddy; Sudipa Saha Roy; Mohan Natarajan; Takayoshi Suzuki; Yan Peng; Ganesh Raj; Ratna K Vadlamudi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Strong association of epidermal growth factor receptor status with breast cancer FDG uptake.

Authors:  Joohee Lee; Eun Jeong Lee; Seung Hwan Moon; Seokhwi Kim; Seung Hyup Hyun; Young Seok Cho; Joon Young Choi; Byung-Tae Kim; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Active smoking and survival following breast cancer among African American and non-African American women in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study.

Authors:  Humberto Parada; Xuezheng Sun; Chiu-Kit Tse; Andrew F Olshan; Melissa A Troester; Kathleen Conway
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 8.  p53 in survival, death and metabolic health: a lifeguard with a licence to kill.

Authors:  Flore Kruiswijk; Christiaan F Labuschagne; Karen H Vousden
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 94.444

9.  Disease evolution and heterogeneity in bilateral breast cancer.

Authors:  Elena Fountzilas; Vassiliki Kotoula; Flora Zagouri; Eleni Giannoulatou; George Kouvatseas; George Pentheroudakis; Triantafyllia Koletsa; Mattheos Bobos; Kyriaki Papadopoulou; Epaminontas Samantas; Efterpi Demiri; Spyros Miliaras; Christos Christodoulou; Sofia Chrisafi; Evangelia Razis; Florentia Fostira; Dimitrios Pectasides; George Zografos; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 10.  Contribution of p53 to metastasis.

Authors:  Emily Powell; David Piwnica-Worms; Helen Piwnica-Worms
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 39.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.