Literature DB >> 24073466

High and varying prices for privately insured patients underscore hospital market power.

Chapin White1, Amelia M Bond, James D Reschovsky.   

Abstract

Across 13 selected U.S. metropolitan areas, hospital prices for privately insured patients are much higher than Medicare payment rates and vary widely across and within markets, according to a study by the Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) based on claims data for about 590,000 active and retired nonelderly autoworkers and their dependents. Across the 13 communities, aver­age hospital prices for privately insured patients are about one-and-a-half times Medicare rates for inpatient care and two times what Medicare pays for outpa­tient care. Within individual communities, prices vary widely, with the highest-priced hospital typically paid 60 percent more for inpatient services than the lowest-priced hospital. The price gap within markets is even greater for hospital outpatient care, with the highest-priced hospital typically paid nearly double the lowest-priced hospital. In contrast to the wide variation in hospital prices for pri­vately insured patients across and within markets, prices for primary care physi­cian services generally are close to Medicare rates and vary little within markets. Prices for specialist physician services, however, are higher relative to Medicare and vary more across and within markets. Of the 13 markets, five are in Michigan, which has an unusually concentrated private insurance market, with one insurer commanding a 70-percent market share. Despite the presence of a dominant insurer, almost all Michigan hospi­tals command prices that are higher than Medicare, and some hospitals com­mand prices that are twice what Medicare pays. In the eight markets outside of Michigan, private insurers generally pay even higher hospital prices, with even wider gaps between high- and low-priced hospitals. The variation in hospital and specialist physician prices within communities underscores that some hospitals and physicians have significant market power to command high prices, even in markets with a dominant insurer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24073466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Brief


  11 in total

1.  How do health insurer market concentration and bargaining power with hospitals affect health insurance premiums?

Authors:  Erin E Trish; Bradley J Herring
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 2.  Factors Contributing to Variations in Physicians' Use of Evidence at The Point of Care: A Conceptual Model.

Authors:  James D Reschovsky; Eugene C Rich; Timothy K Lake
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Disentangling the Linkage of Primary Care Features to Patient Outcomes: A Review of Current Literature, Data Sources, and Measurement Needs.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Eugene C Rich; Alyssa Maccarone; Catherine M DesRoches; Robert J Reid
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Variation in Payment Rates under Medicare's Inpatient Prospective Payment System.

Authors:  Sam Krinsky; Andrew M Ryan; Tod Mijanovich; Jan Blustein
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Modelling competition in health care markets as a complex adaptive system: an agent-based framework.

Authors:  Abdullah Alibrahim; Shinyi Wu
Journal:  Health Syst (Basingstoke)       Date:  2019-01-24

6.  Physician Reimbursement in Medicare Advantage Compared With Traditional Medicare and Commercial Health Insurance.

Authors:  Erin Trish; Paul Ginsburg; Laura Gascue; Geoffrey Joyce
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  The Comparative Advantage of Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Joseph P Newhouse; Mary Beth Landrum; Mary Price; J Michael McWilliams; John Hsu; Thomas G McGuire
Journal:  Am J Health Econ       Date:  2019-04-23

8.  Prices for physician services in Medicare Advantage versus traditional Medicare.

Authors:  Julius L Chen; Andrew L Hicks; Michael E Chernew
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.229

9.  Association of a national insurer's reference-based pricing program and choice of imaging facility, spending, and utilization.

Authors:  Anna D Sinaiko; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Do the uninsured demand less care? Evidence from Maryland's hospitals.

Authors:  Amanda Cook
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2020-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.