Literature DB >> 24073142

Exploring dispositional tendencies to seek online information about direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Ryan S Paquin1, Adam S Richards, Laura M Koehly, Colleen M McBride.   

Abstract

Varying perspectives exist regarding the implications of genetic susceptibility testing for common disease, with some anticipating adverse effects and others expecting positive outcomes; however, little is known about the characteristics of people who are most likely to be interested in direct-to-consumer genetic testing. To that end, this study examines the association of individual dispositional differences with health risk perceptions and online information seeking related to a free genetic susceptibility test. Healthy adults enrolled in a large health maintenance organization were surveyed by telephone. Eligible participants (N = 1,959) were given access to a secure website that provided risk and benefit information about a genetic susceptibility test and given the option to be tested. Neuroticism was associated with increased perceptions of disease risk but not with logging on. Those scoring high in conscientiousness were more likely to log on. We found no evidence that neuroticism, a dispositional characteristic commonly linked to adverse emotional response, was predictive of online genetic information seeking in this sample of healthy adults.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct-to-consumer genetic tests; Individual differences; Information seeking; Perceived risk

Year:  2012        PMID: 24073142      PMCID: PMC3717920          DOI: 10.1007/s13142-012-0159-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.046


  25 in total

1.  PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model.

Authors:  LeeAnn Kahlor
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2010-06

2.  Predictive testing for hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: motivation, illness representations and short-term psychological impact.

Authors:  Erna Claes; Lieve Denayer; Gerry Evers-Kiebooms; Andrea Boogaerts; Eric Legius
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2004-11

3.  Genomics--the perfect information-seeking research problem.

Authors:  J David Johnson; Donald O Case; James E Andrews; Suzanne L Allard
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005-06

Review 4.  The current landscape for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: legal, ethical, and policy issues.

Authors:  Stuart Hogarth; Gail Javitt; David Melzer
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 8.929

5.  Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?

Authors:  T Caulfield; N M Ries; P N Ray; C Shuman; B Wilson
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Participation in genetic testing research varies by social group.

Authors:  Sharon Hensley Alford; Colleen M McBride; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Information utilization and personality.

Authors:  J B Kernan; R Mojena
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  1973-09

8.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors.

Authors:  R J Griffin; S Dunwoody; K Neuwirth
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.498

Review 9.  Effortful control, explicit processing, and the regulation of human evolved predispositions.

Authors:  Kevin B MacDonald
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Characteristics of users of online personalized genomic risk assessments: implications for physician-patient interactions.

Authors:  Colleen M McBride; Sharon Hensley Alford; Robert J Reid; Eric B Larson; Andreas D Baxevanis; Lawrence C Brody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Elisabetta Ceretti; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.