Literature DB >> 24072588

Semantic significance: a new measure of feature salience.

Maria Montefinese1, Ettore Ambrosini, Beth Fairfield, Nicola Mammarella.   

Abstract

According to the feature-based model of semantic memory, concepts are described by a set of semantic features that contribute, with different weights, to the meaning of a concept. Interestingly, this theoretical framework has introduced numerous dimensions to describe semantic features. Recently, we proposed a new parameter to measure the importance of a semantic feature for the conceptual representation-that is, semantic significance. Here, with speeded verification tasks, we tested the predictive value of our index and investigated the relative roles of conceptual and featural dimensions on the participants' performance. The results showed that semantic significance is a good predictor of participants' verification latencies and suggested that it efficiently captures the salience of a feature for the computation of the meaning of a given concept. Therefore, we suggest that semantic significance can be considered an effective index of the importance of a feature in a given conceptual representation. Moreover, we propose that it may have straightforward implications for feature-based models of semantic memory, as an important additional factor for understanding conceptual representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24072588     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-013-0365-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  34 in total

1.  Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns).

Authors:  George S Cree; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2003-06

2.  Naming from definition, semantic relevance and feature type: the effects of aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  J Frederico Marques; Stefano F Cappa; Giuseppe Sartori
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Semantic relevance best predicts normal and abnormal name retrieval.

Authors:  G Sartori; L Lombardi; L Mattiuzzi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Feature type effects in semantic memory: an event related potentials study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Sartori; David Polezzi; Francesca Mameli; Luigi Lombardi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 3.046

5.  The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia.

Authors:  Gian Daniele Zannino; Roberta Perri; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Margherita Di Paola; Carlo Caltagirone; Giovanni A Carlesimo
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory.

Authors:  George S Cree; Chris McNorgan; Ken McRae
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  A neural signature of phonological access: distinguishing the effects of word frequency from familiarity and length in overt picture naming.

Authors:  William W Graves; Thomas J Grabowski; Sonya Mehta; Jean K Gordon
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Word associations: network and semantic properties.

Authors:  Simon De Deyne; Gert Storms
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-02

9.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

10.  Semantic memory: a feature-based analysis and new norms for Italian.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Ettore Ambrosini; Beth Fairfield; Nicola Mammarella
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2013-06
View more
  7 in total

1.  The eye in hand: predicting others' behavior by integrating multiple sources of information.

Authors:  Ettore Ambrosini; Giovanni Pezzulo; Marcello Costantini
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Semantic similarity between old and new items produces false alarms in recognition memory.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Gian Daniele Zannino; Ettore Ambrosini
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-30

3.  Category norms with a cross-sectional sample of adults in the United States: Consideration of cohort, age, and historical effects on semantic categories.

Authors:  Nichol Castro; Taylor Curley; Christopher Hertzog
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-04

4.  What is the right place for atypical exemplars? Commentary: The right hemisphere contribution to semantic categorization: a TMS study.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Marco Ciavarro; Ettore Ambrosini
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-08

5.  Affective Norms for Italian Words in Older Adults: Age Differences in Ratings of Valence, Arousal and Dominance.

Authors:  Beth Fairfield; Ettore Ambrosini; Nicola Mammarella; Maria Montefinese
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: "The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access".

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; David Vinson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10

7.  Let's Not Miss the Forest for the Trees: A Reply to Montefinese and Vinson's (2015) Commentary on Vieth et al. (2014).

Authors:  Harrison E Vieth; Katie L McMahon; Greig I de Zubicaray
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.