Literature DB >> 16352319

The role of semantic distance in category-specific impairments for living things: evidence from a case of semantic dementia.

Gian Daniele Zannino1, Roberta Perri, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Margherita Di Paola, Carlo Caltagirone, Giovanni A Carlesimo.   

Abstract

In this paper, we describe a patient (LI) suffering from semantic dementia who showed a category-specific naming impairment for living things over and above the effects of several nonsemantic confounding variables. We investigated the characteristics of LI's impairment to address the following three issues raised in three different accounts of category-specific impairments: (i) the role of an imbalance in the loss of sensory compared to nonsensory features (assumed by the Sensory Functional Theory [Warrington, E. K., & Shallice, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairments. Brain, 107, 829-859]); (ii) the role of cross domain differences in Feature Correlation (assumed by the Conceptual Structure Account [Moss, H., Tyler, L. K., & Devlin, J. T. (2002). The emergence of category-specific deficits in a distributed semantic system. In: E. M. E. Forde & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Category Specificity in Brain and Mind (pp. 115-147). New York: Psychology Press]); (iii) the role of semantic distance (proposed by Cree and McRae [Cree, G. S., & McRae, K. (2003). Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 163-201]). We found that semantic distance was the only factor causally linked to LI's poorer performance on living things. In fact, her naming performance was less accurate on items that had many semantic neighbours, which is typical of living things. On the contrary, a feature listing task revealed that the features available to LI were not predicted by their level of correlation, as expected by the Conceptual Structure Account. Finally, at variance with the Sensory Functional Theory, although LI quoted sensory features less accurately than nonsensory ones, this did not give rise to a disproportionate loss of semantic features in the living domain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16352319     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  10 in total

1.  Dissociated neural correlates of quantity processing of quantifiers, numbers, and numerosities.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Chuansheng Chen; Tao Yang; Han Zhang; Xinlin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Words and objects at the tip of the left temporal lobe in primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  M-Marsel Mesulam; Christina Wieneke; Robert Hurley; Alfred Rademaker; Cynthia K Thompson; Sandra Weintraub; Emily J Rogalski
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 13.501

3.  Semantic similarity between old and new items produces false alarms in recognition memory.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Gian Daniele Zannino; Ettore Ambrosini
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-09-30

Review 4.  Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Solène Kalénine
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Neurology of anomia in the semantic variant of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Marsel Mesulam; Emily Rogalski; Christina Wieneke; Derin Cobia; Alfred Rademaker; Cynthia Thompson; Sandra Weintraub
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Conservation of species, volume, and belief in patients with Alzheimer's disease: the issue of domain specificity and conceptual impairment.

Authors:  Deborah Zaitchik; Gregg E A Solomon
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Different categories of living and non-living sound-sources activate distinct cortical networks.

Authors:  Lauren R Engel; Chris Frum; Aina Puce; Nathan A Walker; James W Lewis
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Semantic significance: a new measure of feature salience.

Authors:  Maria Montefinese; Ettore Ambrosini; Beth Fairfield; Nicola Mammarella
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-04

9.  A category-selective semantic memory deficit for animate objects in semantic variant primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Shalom K Henderson; Sheena I Dev; Rania Ezzo; Megan Quimby; Bonnie Wong; Michael Brickhouse; Daisy Hochberg; Alexandra Touroutoglou; Bradford C Dickerson; Claire Cordella; Jessica A Collins
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2021-09-14

Review 10.  Word-finding difficulty: a clinical analysis of the progressive aphasias.

Authors:  Jonathan D Rohrer; William D Knight; Jane E Warren; Nick C Fox; Martin N Rossor; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 13.501

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.