BACKGROUND: Protecting the health of the work force has become an important issue in public health research. PURPOSE: This study aims to explore potential associations between supportive leadership style (SLS), an aspect of leadership behavior, and self-rated health (SRH) among employees. METHOD: We drew on cross-sectional data from a cohort of industrial workers (n = 3,331), collected in 2009. We assessed employees' ratings of supportive, employee-oriented leadership behavior at their job, their SRH, and work stress as measured by the effort-reward model and scales measuring demands, control, and social support. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the perception of poor SLS and poor SRH controlling for work-related stress and other confounders. Sensitivity analyses stratified models by sex, age, and managerial position to test the robustness of associations. RESULTS: Perception of poor SLS was associated with poor SRH [OR 2.39 (95 % CI 1.95-2.92)]. Although attenuated following adjustment for measures of work-related stress and other confounders [OR 1.60 (95 % CI 1.26-2.04)], the magnitude, direction, and significance of this association remained robust in stratified models in most subgroups. CONCLUSION: SLS appears to be relevant to health in the workplace. Leadership behavior may represent a promising area for future research with potential for promoting better health in a large segment of the adult population.
BACKGROUND: Protecting the health of the work force has become an important issue in public health research. PURPOSE: This study aims to explore potential associations between supportive leadership style (SLS), an aspect of leadership behavior, and self-rated health (SRH) among employees. METHOD: We drew on cross-sectional data from a cohort of industrial workers (n = 3,331), collected in 2009. We assessed employees' ratings of supportive, employee-oriented leadership behavior at their job, their SRH, and work stress as measured by the effort-reward model and scales measuring demands, control, and social support. Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between the perception of poor SLS and poor SRH controlling for work-related stress and other confounders. Sensitivity analyses stratified models by sex, age, and managerial position to test the robustness of associations. RESULTS: Perception of poor SLS was associated with poor SRH [OR 2.39 (95 % CI 1.95-2.92)]. Although attenuated following adjustment for measures of work-related stress and other confounders [OR 1.60 (95 % CI 1.26-2.04)], the magnitude, direction, and significance of this association remained robust in stratified models in most subgroups. CONCLUSION:SLS appears to be relevant to health in the workplace. Leadership behavior may represent a promising area for future research with potential for promoting better health in a large segment of the adult population.
Authors: Jian Li; Adrian Loerbroks; Marc N Jarczok; Ina Schöllgen; Jos A Bosch; Daniel Mauss; Johannes Siegrist; Joachim E Fischer Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Hugo Westerlund; Anna Nyberg; Peggy Bernin; Martin Hyde; Gabriel Oxenstierna; Paavo Jäppinen; Ari Väänänen; Töres Theorell Journal: Work Date: 2010
Authors: Gary D Sherman; Jooa J Lee; Amy J C Cuddy; Jonathan Renshon; Christopher Oveis; James J Gross; Jennifer S Lerner Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Raphael M Herr; Jian Li; Jos A Bosch; Burkhard Schmidt; David M DeJoy; Joachim E Fischer; Adrian Loerbroks Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2012-12-25 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Bo Netterstrøm; Nicole Conrad; Per Bech; Per Fink; Ole Olsen; Reiner Rugulies; Stephen Stansfeld Journal: Epidemiol Rev Date: 2008-06-27 Impact factor: 6.222
Authors: Mika Kivimäki; Solja T Nyberg; G David Batty; Eleonor I Fransson; Katriina Heikkilä; Lars Alfredsson; Jakob B Bjorner; Marianne Borritz; Hermann Burr; Annalisa Casini; Els Clays; Dirk De Bacquer; Nico Dragano; Jane E Ferrie; Goedele A Geuskens; Marcel Goldberg; Mark Hamer; Wendela E Hooftman; Irene L Houtman; Matti Joensuu; Markus Jokela; France Kittel; Anders Knutsson; Markku Koskenvuo; Aki Koskinen; Anne Kouvonen; Meena Kumari; Ida E H Madsen; Michael G Marmot; Martin L Nielsen; Maria Nordin; Tuula Oksanen; Jaana Pentti; Reiner Rugulies; Paula Salo; Johannes Siegrist; Archana Singh-Manoux; Sakari B Suominen; Ari Väänänen; Jussi Vahtera; Marianna Virtanen; Peter J M Westerholm; Hugo Westerlund; Marie Zins; Andrew Steptoe; Töres Theorell Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Raphael M Herr; Frenk Van Harreveld; Bert N Uchino; Wendy C Birmingham; Adrian Loerbroks; Joachim E Fischer; Jos A Bosch Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2018-10-26
Authors: Burkhard Schmidt; Raphael M Herr; Marc N Jarczok; Jens Baumert; Karoline Lukaschek; Rebecca T Emeny; Karl-Heinz Ladwig Journal: Int Arch Occup Environ Health Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 3.015
Authors: Marc N Jarczok; Marcus E Kleber; Julian Koenig; Adrian Loerbroks; Raphael M Herr; Kristina Hoffmann; Joachim E Fischer; Yael Benyamini; Julian F Thayer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Britta Worringer; Melanie Genrich; Andreas Müller; Florian Junne; Peter Angerer Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jessica Scharf; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Jian Li; Andreas Müller; Stefan Wilm; Peter Angerer; Adrian Loerbroks Journal: J Occup Med Toxicol Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 2.646
Authors: Jessica Scharf; Patricia Vu-Eickmann; Jian Li; Andreas Müller; Peter Angerer; Adrian Loerbroks Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Annegret Dreher; Rita Yusuf; Hasan Ashraf; Syed A K Shifat Ahmed; Christian Strümpell; Adrian Loerbroks Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Erin Shore; Natalie Schwatka; Miranda Dally; Carol E Brown; Liliana Tenney; Lee S Newman Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2020-02 Impact factor: 2.306