Literature DB >> 24072233

The relationship between genetic profiling, clinicopathological factors and survival in patients undergoing surgery for node-negative colorectal cancer: 10-year follow-up.

Arfon G M T Powell1, Jenny Ferguson, Fahd Al-Mulla, Clare Orange, Donald C McMillan, Paul G Horgan, Joanne Edwards, James J Going.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The introduction of the bowel cancer screening programme has resulted in increasing numbers of patients being diagnosed with node-negative disease. Unfortunately, approximately 30 % will develop recurrence following surgery. Given the toxicity associated with adjuvant chemotherapy, it is important to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy. This study aims to identify which clinicopathological factors and genetic profiling markers predict outcome in node-negative disease.
METHODS: Forty-nine microsatellite stable (MSS) patients undergoing curative resection between 1991 and 1993 were included. Local immune response was assessed by Klintrup criteria and vascular invasion status assessed through Miller's elastin staining. Comparative genomic hybridisation (CGH) on a range of loci provided data on allelic imbalance. Analysis of survival included clinicopathological and CGH data in a multivariate (Cox) model.
RESULTS: On binary logistical regression analysis, 4p deletion was independently associated with low Klintrup score (HR 0.16; 95 % CI (0.03-0.96); P = 0.045), venous invasion (HR 4.19; 95 % CI (1.08-16.29); P = 0.039) and higher Dukes' stage (HR 6.43; 95 % CI (1.22-33.97); P = 0.028). Minimum follow-up was 109 months and there were 24 cancer deaths. On multivariate analysis, high Klintrup score (HR 0.33; 95 % CI (0.12-0.93); P = 0.036), 4p- (HR 4.01; 95 % CI (1.58-10.21); P = 0.004) and 5q- (HR 3.81; 95 % CI (1.54-9.47); P = 0.004) were significantly associated with survival.
CONCLUSION: 4p-, 5q- and low Klintrup score were independently associated with poor cancer-specific survival in node-negative MSS colorectal cancer. Confirmatory work in a larger cohort is needed to determine whether these markers may be used to identify patients who may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24072233     DOI: 10.1007/s00432-013-1521-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  20 in total

1.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for resected stage II and III colon cancer: comparison of two widely used prognostic calculators.

Authors:  Aditya Bardia; Charles Loprinzi; Axel Grothey; Garth Nelson; Steven Alberts; Smitha Menon; Stephan Thome; Sharlene Gill; Dan Sargent
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.929

2.  Inflammation and prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kai Klintrup; Johanna M Mäkinen; Saila Kauppila; Päivi O Väre; Jukka Melkko; Hannu Tuominen; Karoliina Tuppurainen; Jyrki Mäkelä; Tuomo J Karttunen; Markus J Mäkinen
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2005-10-18       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Chromosomal imbalances are associated with a high risk of progression in early invasive (pT1) urinary bladder cancer.

Authors:  J Richter; U Wagner; P Schraml; R Maurer; G Alund; H Knönagel; H Moch; M J Mihatsch; T C Gasser; G Sauter
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  The "Mutated in Colorectal Cancer" Protein Is a Novel Target of the UV-Induced DNA Damage Checkpoint.

Authors:  Laurent Pangon; Nicholas D Sigglekow; Mark Larance; Sam Al-Sohaily; Dessislava N Mladenova; Christina I Selinger; Elizabeth A Musgrove; Maija R J Kohonen-Corish
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2010-09

5.  Apoptosis as a cellular predictor for histopathologic response to neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Claus Rödel; Gerhard G Grabenbauer; Thomas Papadopoulos; Marc Bigalke; Klaus Günther; Christoph Schick; Andrea Peters; Rolf Sauer; Franz Rödel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Cytogenetic analyses of secondary liver tumors reveal significant differences in genomic imbalances between primary and metastatic colon carcinomas.

Authors:  L A Parada; A Marañon; M Hallén; K G Tranberg; U Stenram; G Bardi; B Johansson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.150

Review 7.  New approaches to assessing and treating early-stage colon and rectal cancers: cooperative group strategies for assessing optimal approaches in early-stage disease.

Authors:  Al B Benson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K Söreide; E A M Janssen; H Söiland; H Körner; J P A Baak
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Chromosomal instability rather than p53 mutation is associated with response to neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Katja Ott; Holger Vogelsang; James Mueller; Karen Becker; Martina Müller; Ulrich Fink; Jörg Rüdiger Siewert; Heinz Höfler; Gisela Keller
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  A transposon-based genetic screen in mice identifies genes altered in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Timothy K Starr; Raha Allaei; Kevin A T Silverstein; Rodney A Staggs; Aaron L Sarver; Tracy L Bergemann; Mihir Gupta; M Gerard O'Sullivan; Ilze Matise; Adam J Dupuy; Lara S Collier; Scott Powers; Ann L Oberg; Yan W Asmann; Stephen N Thibodeau; Lino Tessarollo; Neal G Copeland; Nancy A Jenkins; Robert T Cormier; David A Largaespada
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Prognostic stratification of colorectal cancer patients: current perspectives.

Authors:  Nora I Schneider; Cord Langner
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 3.989

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.