Literature DB >> 18006800

New approaches to assessing and treating early-stage colon and rectal cancers: cooperative group strategies for assessing optimal approaches in early-stage disease.

Al B Benson1.   

Abstract

The U.S. Gastrointestinal Intergroup (GI Intergroup), including the National Cancer Institute of Canada, has created a portfolio of clinical trials for patients with stage II and III colon and rectal cancer, integrating therapeutic strategies from recent advanced disease trials. Fluoropyrimidine-based combination therapy for metastatic disease, with either irinotecan or oxaliplatin plus bevacizumab, has resulted in significant improvement in response and disease-free and overall survival. Cetuximab and irinotecan have produced intriguing response and progression-free survival data from randomized phase II trials. Although patients with stage II and III rectal cancer are uniformly included in individual clinical trials, the GI Intergroup conducts separate trials in patients with stage II and III colon cancer, with the exception of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), which continues to merge both stages in their statistical designs. The U.S. chemotherapy platform for adjuvant therapy clinical trials is based on the positive adjuvant data from NSABP C-07 [FLOX with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)] and the MOSAIC trial (FOLFOX with infusional 5-FU). Three irinotecan-based adjuvant trials (one U.S. and two European) did not reach designated statistical end points. In addition, the GI Intergroup has consistently integrated molecular biological and other laboratory projects as important components of past and current trials. NSABP has recently completed accrual of patients to C-08, which is evaluating FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab in stage II/III colon cancer. E5202, the largest U.S. stage II colon cancer trial, determines patient risk by the initial evaluation of tumor 18q loss of heterozygosity and microsatellite instability status. Low-risk patients are observed, whereas high-risk patients are randomized to FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab. N0147 evaluates FOLFOX with or without cetuximab in patients with stage III disease. Two large rectal cancer trials have begun to accrue patients. NSABP R-04 compares neoadjuvant radiation with either continuous infusion 5-FU with or without oxaliplatin versus capecitabine with or without oxaliplatin. E5204 is the adjuvant comparison of FOLFOX with or without bevacizumab and is also available to NSABP R-04 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18006800     DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  19 in total

1.  Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  Kah Hoong Chang; Myles J Smith; Oliver J McAnena; Arifin S Aprjanto; Joe F Dowdall
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Recent advances in gastrointestinal oncology--updates and insights from the 2009 annual meeting of the American society of clinical oncology.

Authors:  Milind Javle; Chung-Tsen Hsueh
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 17.388

Review 3.  Molecular profiling of colon tumors: the search for clinically relevant biomarkers of progression, prognosis, therapeutics, and predisposition.

Authors:  Manny D Bacolod; Francis Barany
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Expression and potential role of apolipoprotein D on the death-survival balance of human colorectal cancer cells under oxidative stress conditions.

Authors:  Raquel Bajo-Grañeras; Jesús Crespo-Sanjuan; Rosa M García-Centeno; José Antonio Garrote-Adrados; Gabriel Gutierrez; Manuel García-Tejeiro; Beatriz Aguirre-Gervás; María D Calvo-Nieves; Rosa Bustamante; Maria D Ganfornina; Diego Sanchez
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

6.  The relationship between genetic profiling, clinicopathological factors and survival in patients undergoing surgery for node-negative colorectal cancer: 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Arfon G M T Powell; Jenny Ferguson; Fahd Al-Mulla; Clare Orange; Donald C McMillan; Paul G Horgan; Joanne Edwards; James J Going
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Anastomotic leakage contributes to the risk for systemic recurrence in stage II colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Katoh; Keishi Yamashita; Guoqin Wang; Takeo Sato; Takatoshi Nakamura; Masahiko Watanabe
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Preoperative intensified radiochemotherapy for rectal cancer: experience of a single institution.

Authors:  Francesco Dionisi; Daniela Musio; Nicola Raffetto; Giovanni Codacci-Pisanelli; Eva Iannacone; Rossella Caiazzo; Enzo Banelli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Financial Consequences of Improved Treatments for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Wong
Journal:  Semin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-12-01

10.  A clinical risk score to predict 3-, 5- and 10-year survival in patients undergoing surgery for Dukes B colorectal cancer.

Authors:  D C McMillan; C S McArdle; D S Morrison
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.