Literature DB >> 23579419

Diagnostic performance of MRI measurements to assess hindfoot malalignment. An assessment of four measurement techniques.

Florian M Buck1, Adrienne Hoffmann, Nadja Mamisch-Saupe, Mazda Farshad, Donald Resnick, Norman Espinosa, Juerg Hodler.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the ability of coronal non-weight-bearing MR images to discriminate between normal and abnormal hindfoot alignment.
METHODS: Three different measurement techniques (calcaneal axis, medial/lateral calcaneal contour) based on weight-bearing hindfoot alignment radiographs were applied in 49 patients (mean, 48 years; range 21-76 years). Three groups of subjects were enrolled: (1) normal hindfoot alignment (0°-10° valgus); (2) abnormal valgus (>10°); (3) any degree of varus hindfoot alignment. Hindfoot alignment was then measured on coronal MR images using four different measurement techniques (calcaneal axis, medial/lateral calcaneal contour, sustentaculum tangent). ROC analysis was performed to find the MR measurement with the greatest sensitivity and specificity for discrimination between normal and abnormal hindfoot alignment.
RESULTS: The most accurate measurement on MR images to detect abnormal hindfoot valgus was the one using the medial calcaneal contour, reaching a sensitivity/specificity of 86 %/75 % using a cutoff value of >11° valgus. The most accurate measurement on MR images to detect abnormal hindfoot varus was the sustentaculum tangent, reaching a sensitivity/specificity of 91 %/71 % using a cutoff value of <12° valgus.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to suspect abnormal hindfoot alignment on coronal non-weight-bearing MR images. KEY POINTS: • Abnormal hindfoot alignment can be identified on coronal non-weight-bearing MR images. • The sustentaculum tangent was the best predictor of an abnormally varus hindfoot. • The medial calcaneal contour was the best predictor of a valgus hindfoot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23579419     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2839-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  CT analysis of hindfoot alignment in chronic lateral ankle instability.

Authors:  Anthony B Van Bergeyk; Alastair Younger; Brent Carson
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.827

Review 2.  Radiographic assessment of the hindfoot and ankle.

Authors:  Walter W Strash; Peter Berardo
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.231

3.  Classification and treatment of supramalleolar deformities.

Authors:  Markus Knupp; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Lilianna Bolliger; Alexej Barg; Beat Hintermann
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.827

4.  Hindfoot alignment measurements: rotation-stability of measurement techniques on hindfoot alignment view and long axial view radiographs.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Adrienne Hoffmann; Nadja Mamisch-Saupe; Norman Espinosa; Donald Resnick; Juerg Hodler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  A systematic approach to evaluation of the rearfoot, ankle, and leg in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Robert W Mendicino; Alan R Catanzariti; Christopher L Reeves; Glenda L King
Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  The valgus ankle.

Authors:  Vic Gibson; David Prieskorn
Journal:  Foot Ankle Clin       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.653

7.  Computed tomography of the hindfoot.

Authors:  S E Seltzer; B N Weissman; E M Braunstein; D F Adams; W H Thomas
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Realignment surgery as alternative treatment of varus and valgus ankle osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Geert I Pagenstert; Beat Hintermann; Alexej Barg; André Leumann; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Low tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the ankle. Results of a new operation in 18 patients.

Authors:  Y Takakura; Y Tanaka; T Kumai; S Tamai
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01

10.  Measuring hindfoot alignment radiographically: the long axial view is more reliable than the hindfoot alignment view.

Authors:  Mikel L Reilingh; Lijkele Beimers; Gabriëlle J M Tuijthof; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Mario Maas; C Niek van Dijk
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  4 in total

1.  Upright cone CT of the hindfoot: comparison of the non-weight-bearing with the upright weight-bearing position.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Georg Klammer; Norman Espinosa; Florian M Buck
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Assessment of hindfoot alignment using MRI and standing hindfoot alignment radiographs (Saltzman view).

Authors:  Nydia Büber; Marco Zanetti; Arno Frigg; Nadja Saupe
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The horizontal calcaneofibular ligament: a sign of hindfoot valgus on ankle MRI.

Authors:  Sangoh Lee; Ines Oliveira; Ian Pressney; Matthew Welck; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  The double fascicular variations of the anterior talofibular ligament and the calcaneofibular ligament correlate with interconnections between lateral ankle structures revealed on magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Paweł Szaro; Khaldun Ghali Gataa; Mateusz Polaczek; Bogdan Ciszek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.