| Literature DB >> 24071595 |
Motohiro Kato1, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Daisuke Tomizawa, Yasuhiro Okamoto, Jiro Inagaki, Katsuyoshi Koh, Atsushi Ogawa, Keiko Okada, Yuko Cho, Junko Takita, Hiroaki Goto, Hisashi Sakamaki, Hiromasa Yabe, Keisei Kawa, Ritsuro Suzuki, Kazuko Kudo, Koji Kato.
Abstract
Recent reports revealed that intravenous (iv) busulfan (BU) may not only reduce early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but also improve overall survival (OS) probability in adults. Therefore, we retrospectively compared outcomes for 460 children with acute leukemia who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with either iv-BU (n = 198) or oral busulfan (oral-BU) (n = 262) myeloablative conditioning. OS at 3 years was 53.4% ± 3.7% with iv-BU and 55.1% ± 3.1% with oral-BU; the difference was not statistically significant (P = .77). OS at 3 years in 241 acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 219 acute myeloid leukemia patients was 56.4% ± 5.5% with iv-BU and 54.6% ± 4.1 with oral-BU (P = .51) and 51.0% ± 5.0% with iv-BU and 55.8% ± 4.8% with oral-BU (P = .83), respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years with iv-BU was similar to that with oral-BU (39.0% ± 3.6% and 36.4% ± 3.1%, respectively; P = .67). Cumulative incidence of NRM at 3 years was 16.6% ± 2.7% with iv-BU and 18.3% ± 2.5% with oral-BU (P = .51). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed no significant survival advantage with iv-BU. In conclusion, iv-BU failed to show a significant survival advantage in children with acute leukemia.Entities:
Keywords: Acute leukemia; Busulfan; Children
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24071595 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.09.012
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant ISSN: 1083-8791 Impact factor: 5.742