Literature DB >> 24071595

Comparison of intravenous with oral busulfan in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with myeloablative conditioning regimens for pediatric acute leukemia.

Motohiro Kato1, Yoshiyuki Takahashi, Daisuke Tomizawa, Yasuhiro Okamoto, Jiro Inagaki, Katsuyoshi Koh, Atsushi Ogawa, Keiko Okada, Yuko Cho, Junko Takita, Hiroaki Goto, Hisashi Sakamaki, Hiromasa Yabe, Keisei Kawa, Ritsuro Suzuki, Kazuko Kudo, Koji Kato.   

Abstract

Recent reports revealed that intravenous (iv) busulfan (BU) may not only reduce early nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but also improve overall survival (OS) probability in adults. Therefore, we retrospectively compared outcomes for 460 children with acute leukemia who underwent hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with either iv-BU (n = 198) or oral busulfan (oral-BU) (n = 262) myeloablative conditioning. OS at 3 years was 53.4% ± 3.7% with iv-BU and 55.1% ± 3.1% with oral-BU; the difference was not statistically significant (P = .77). OS at 3 years in 241 acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 219 acute myeloid leukemia patients was 56.4% ± 5.5% with iv-BU and 54.6% ± 4.1 with oral-BU (P = .51) and 51.0% ± 5.0% with iv-BU and 55.8% ± 4.8% with oral-BU (P = .83), respectively. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years with iv-BU was similar to that with oral-BU (39.0% ± 3.6% and 36.4% ± 3.1%, respectively; P = .67). Cumulative incidence of NRM at 3 years was 16.6% ± 2.7% with iv-BU and 18.3% ± 2.5% with oral-BU (P = .51). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed no significant survival advantage with iv-BU. In conclusion, iv-BU failed to show a significant survival advantage in children with acute leukemia.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute leukemia; Busulfan; Children

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24071595     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant        ISSN: 1083-8791            Impact factor:   5.742


  8 in total

1.  Therapeutic drug monitoring for either oral or intravenous busulfan when combined with pre- and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Lindsey R Lombardi; Christopher G Kanakry; Marianna Zahurak; Nadira Durakovic; Javier Bolaños-Meade; Yvette L Kasamon; Douglas E Gladstone; William Matsui; Ivan Borrello; Carol Ann Huff; Lode J Swinnen; Robert A Brodsky; Richard F Ambinder; Ephraim J Fuchs; Gary L Rosner; Richard J Jones; Leo Luznik
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2015-10-12

Review 2.  Optimizing drug therapy in pediatric SCT: focus on pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  J S McCune; P Jacobson; A Wiseman; O Militano
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 3.  Management of Neuroblastoma: ICMR Consensus Document.

Authors:  Deepak Bansal; Sidharth Totadri; Girish Chinnaswamy; Sandeep Agarwala; Tushar Vora; Brijesh Arora; Maya Prasad; Gauri Kapoor; Venkatraman Radhakrishnan; Siddharth Laskar; Tanvir Kaur; G K Rath; Sameer Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Association of Antiepileptic Medications with Outcomes after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide Conditioning.

Authors:  Jeannine S McCune; Tao Wang; Khalid Bo-Subait; Mahmoud Aljurf; Amer Beitinjaneh; Joseph Bubalo; Jean-Yves Cahn; Jan Cerny; Saurabh Chhabra; Aaron Cumpston; L Lee Dupuis; Hillard M Lazarus; David I Marks; Richard T Maziarz; Maxim Norkin; Tim Prestidge; Shin Mineishi; Maxwell M Krem; Marcelo Pasquini; Paul J Martin
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Review of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Intravenous Busulfan in Paediatric Patients.

Authors:  Rachael Lawson; Christine E Staatz; Christopher J Fraser; Stefanie Hennig
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Children: Better Transplant Outcomes After Total Body Irradiation-based Conditioning.

Authors:  Jan Styczynski; Robert Debski; Krzysztof Czyzewski; Katarzyna Gagola; Ewa Marquardt; Krzysztof Roszkowski; Janusz Winiecki; Ninela Irga-Jaworska; Marcin Hennig; Katarzyna Muszynska-Roslan; Marcin Plonowski; Tomasz Ociepa; Monika Lecka; Joanna Konieczek; Przemyslaw Galazka; Monika Pogorzala; Monika Richert-Przygonska; Mariusz Wysocki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

7.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Thalassemia Patients: a Jordanian Single Centre Experience.

Authors:  Maher Mustafa; Mousa Qatawneh; Mais Al Jazazi; Omaiema Jarrah; Ruba Al Hazaimeh; Raida Oudat; Moath Al Tarawneh; Rami Al Majali
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2020-12

Review 8.  Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.

Authors:  Khalil Ben Hassine; Madeleine Powys; Peter Svec; Miroslava Pozdechova; Birgitta Versluys; Marc Ansari; Peter J Shaw
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.418

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.