| Literature DB >> 33628130 |
Maher Mustafa1, Mousa Qatawneh1, Mais Al Jazazi1, Omaiema Jarrah1, Ruba Al Hazaimeh1, Raida Oudat2, Moath Al Tarawneh1, Rami Al Majali1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Beta thalassemia major is the commonest inherited hematological disorder worldwide which needs lifelong sufficient supportive management. Hematopoietic stem Cell transplantation (HSCT) is the only curative treatment available till now. AIM: To evaluate the outcome of children who underwent allogenic hematopoietic stem Cell transplantation as a curative approach for Thalassemia Major, treated at Queen Rania AL- Abdullah children Hospital (QRCH).Entities:
Keywords: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Thalassemia
Year: 2020 PMID: 33628130 PMCID: PMC7879431 DOI: 10.5455/msm.2020.32.277-282
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mater Sociomed ISSN: 1512-7680
Patients and Donors Characteristics
| Variables | No. | % |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male | 13 | 38.2 |
| Female | 21 | 61.8 |
| Age at transplantation, years | 6.5 | |
| <= 7 | 23 | 67.6 |
| >7 | 11 | 32.4 |
| Disease severity | ||
| Major | 33 | 97.1 |
| Intermedia | 1 | 2.9 |
| Donor Type | ||
| Brother | 20 | 58.9 |
| Sister | 12 | 35.3 |
| Father | 1 | 2.9 |
| Mother | 1 | 2.9 |
| Pesaro Class | ||
| Two | 31 | 91.2 |
| Three | 3 | 8.8 |
| Conditioning regimen | ||
| BU/CY16/200 | 31 | 91.2 |
| BU/CY14/160 | 3 | 8.8 |
| GVHD prophylaxis | ||
| Cyclosporine + Methotrexate | 34 | 100 |
| Graft type | ||
| Raw bone marrow | 34 | 100 |
| Mean of CD34 count | 3.5 *106/kg of recipient weight |
Univariate analysis of OS and TFS. Univariate analysis of OS and TFS. Univariate analysis showed that age at transplantation was potential key factor for OS: the impacts of gender, donor type, Pesaro class, CD34*106,and condition regimen on OS were not significant (p>0.05).Univariate analysis also showed that gender was potentially related to TFS;the effects of age ,donor type, pesaro class ,CD34 count and conditioning regimen on TFS were not significant. These results are displayed in Table 2.
| Variables | OS, % | P | TFS, % | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender, mean ± SE | 0.35 | 0.04 | ||
| Male | 147.9± 56.1 | 75.0± 9.6 | ||
| Female | 131.4± 45.1 | 48.9± 7.6 | ||
| Age at transplantation, mean ± SE | 0.00 | 0.56 | ||
| <= 7 y | 120.13± 47.2 | 61.4± 7.7 | ||
| > 7 y | 174.5± 30.9 | 53.5 ±11.5 | ||
| Donor type, mean ± SE | 0.12 | 0.63 | ||
| Brother | 129±45.8 | 52.8±8.3 | ||
| Sister | 139±49.5 | 64±10.7 | ||
| Father | 216±0.0 | 84±37.3 | ||
| Mother | 216±0.0 | 84±37.3 | ||
| Pesaro Class | 0.51 | 0.26 | ||
| Two | 135.9±51.4 | 61.1±6.5 | ||
| Three | 156.0±12.0 | 36.2±21.1 | ||
| Conditioning regimen group, mean ± SE | 0.27 | 0.45 | ||
| BU/CY16/200 | 134.8±50.2 | 57.4±6.6 | ||
| BU/CY14/160 | 168.0±31.7 | 72.2±21.2 | ||
| CD34*106 | 146.0±47.7 | 0.1 | 66.0±36.05 | 0.05 |
Multivariate Cox Regression analysis of TFS Cox Regression. A multivariate COX regression analysis indicated that pesaro class was leading factor to difference in TFS [Hazard Ratio (HR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.009 – 0.89, P= 0.04)]. While gender and age at transplantation not potentially affect of TFS. These results noticed in Table 4.
| Variable | HR | 95%CI | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.55 | 0.051 – 6.01 | 0.063 |
| Pesaro Class | 0.09 | 0.009 – 0.89 | 0.04 |
| Age at transplantation | 1 | 0.095 – 11.1 | 0.98 |
| <= 7 y | |||
| > 7 y |